this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
233 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

60450 readers
4132 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/52638736

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I kinda hate this. What I'd really like is the option to turn it on or off. I live near an airport airspace boundary and it's nice to have that wall keeping me from straying into airspace I'm not authorized for, but at the same time, sometimes the drone freezes and won't come back, so it'd be great to be able to get full control back temporarily.

Their reasoning is to give responsibility back to the pilot. A responsible pilot might want that guard rail. Having it as an option only makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

DJI probably wants to avoid lawsuits. I can imagine anyone caught flying in these zones can blame their software.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, and doesn't want to pay people to maintain that feature. It makes sense for them. Still, that feature and their maps were awesome. I hope they don't stop updating their maps that show the boundaries because IMHo they're better than anything else, though I think they may not meet FAA requirements. All the FAA maps I've seen look so primitive and have seemingly contradictory information.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 hours ago

DJI is some kind of drone company, no idea what the acronym stands for but idgaf.

[–] [email protected] 144 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

DJI voluntarily created its geofencing feature, so it makes a certain degree of sense that the company would get rid of it now that the US government no longer seems to appreciate its help, is blocking some of its drone imports, calls DJI a “Chinese Military Company,” and has started the countdown clock on a de facto import ban.

That sounds exactly like how Trump does business, tit for tat and quid pro quos.. thats also why Zuck is acting out - gonna be a wild 4 years

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 67 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

You mispelled depressing. For some reason you spelled it as "wild".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

He also mispelled forever. For some reason he spelled it as "4 years".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago

Well the next 4 years are part of forever

[–] [email protected] 33 points 12 hours ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This is a weird response to the drone hysteria in New Jersey.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 hours ago

also as if the drone hysteria was just right wing clownery

[–] [email protected] 90 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They were about the only hobbyist level drone manufacturer that was doing any sort of geofencing at all. Unsurprising they stopped when none of the other companies saw repercussions for not doing it.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 hours ago

They're the only hobbyist manufacturer with any scale. If you look at the Dedrone stats it's just entirely the DJI show followed by AUTEL by a mile and then DIY stuff. The DIY drones can be built from anything and can be trivially designed to avoid surveillance so you're not gonna get anywhere with them anyway.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

So, just like how pretty much every other drone manufacturers drones already work. Somehow people only give DJI shit over this and develop a curious blind spot about everybody else.

It is trivially easy for anyone with thumbs to kit-build a drone with no regulatory compliance whatsoever, in nearly any size, with absurd range and capabilities, for just a few hundred dollars. Despite that state of affairs having been the case for years, this has mysteriously failed to cause the Earth to fall out of its orbit into the sun.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

IDK, most of the kits require soldering (because the industry is fundamentally braindead) and if you go look at the various online communities, you'll quickly see that this is one hell of a filter.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

i'm scared of the magic cancer smoke

[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Just get the lead free solder and no clean flux, it's much less cancer

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah lead free solder is perfectly fine.

Where I live, lead solder is even illegal to sell and buy unless you have a permit which is impossible to get for individuals

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago

Interesting, I haven't heard about that.

For systems that...may experience some degree of vacuum...it's common to use lead solder still because it doesn't tin whisker so unfortunately it's still around for some of the stuff I've worked on.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago (11 children)

We were taught that at high school....

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You know, they've been dropping a lot of ordinance with cobbled together drones in Ukraine. Just sayin, for no reason in particular reason.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Musk, Bezos and Zuckerberg will be sitting together at Trump's inauguration. This also is a comment that I felt like making for no particular reason.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago

(╭☞´ิ∀´ิ)╭☞

[–] [email protected] 13 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I heard once that people can make improvised explosive contraptions in their own houses.

I just wanted to share a random unrelated fact.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

Smoke alarms contain small quantities of radioactive material. You can also bulk buy smoke alarms on Amazon. You can also buy hazmat suits on Amazon.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

Some of them do, photoelectric ones don't.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Replace the plastic blades with sharpened metal ones, and you got yourself an anti-personnel terrorism machine.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

So is a riding lawn mower. Or a car. The sun can kill you. As can weak ventilation. You could be bitten by a spider, or poisoned by bad food. An aneurysm could take you any second. Death haunts you every day and night, and there is never a guarantee that you'll wake up any time you rest your eyes.

But sure, drones are the threat.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What is your point? That there are already a variety of ways people can die so therefore nobody should be worried about people creating new (easier?) ways?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

You think forging and sharpening custom blades that are capable of lifting a drone and maintaining enough lift while cutting through human flesh to keep operating....you think that's the easier way? Buddy you can kill someone with a sharpened pencil.

If they said "strap a bomb to the drone" it wouldn't be so comically stupid and it would be easier.

Finally, there's just not much of a point in making up a new thing to be vaguely scared of.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

You misspelled pencil in this context. I believe you meant “a fuckin’ pencil”.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This will last exactly as long as it takes somebody to fly a drone into the side of the White House. Not any kind of special drone, just some idiot trying to get a cool shot for their YouTube channel.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

We might get a video of the white house's defence systems shooting it down instead.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

I've done some work related to the anti drone systems and I assure you even the best of the best is an absolute joke against all but the most naive operator. The ultimate drone defense right now is somewhere between magnum #6 bird and #4 turkey shot :/

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If said work was more than a year ago then it is significantly outdated.

Watch perun's videos covering drone warfare in Ukraine it gives a good overview of what has been tried and its effective.

The us government absolutely can shoot down a couple hundred dollar drone its just a matter of if they need to use a half a million dollar intercepted to do it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Ah a fellow perun addict.

Honestly I think he oversold the effectiveness of the systems. The work I did is still ongoing so I'm up to speed on the available systems, though mostly on the RF side. If you watch the stuff coming out of Ukraine the drones aren't really being impeded all that much and if you know how to use ardupilot and selectively enable your data link you can pretty much get away with whatever you want because the US isn't gonna allow anyone to jam GPS right next to multiple major airports. If you want to avoid even relying on GPS there are starting to be mature solutions out there too.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›