this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2025
113 points (86.9% liked)

Technology

60473 readers
6522 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 86 points 3 days ago (4 children)

What the article finds worrisome about this is that it is a "hobbyist in a garage" building what's essential a voice activated and commanded killing machine. They are concerned because it is not "a government lab" or similar. Nobody should be doing this, but okay.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

This cat is thoroughly out of the bag. People have been building computer vision powered automatic sentry guns that shoot paint balls or nerf darts or spray water for a while now.

See, for example, this video from 2012, which was probably about one of the first ones.

In comparison, here's a new video from a few weeks ago as part of "YouTube Maker Secret Santa" where the guy built a very good working Nerf replica of a TF2 level 2 sentry gun. He didn't even bother talking much about the motion tracking part because it was already a solved problem (see timestamp 17:50), so instead he spent the video talking about the ammo chain design and the aesthetics (and playing with the Secret Santa gift he had received from another maker).

That's the state of automatic AI turrets in 2025: trivial enough to omit discussion of the tracking tech and cheap enough to build to fit in a Secret Santa gift budget.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I saw a video before 2008 where a guy hooked an air gun up to a laptop and it was targeting and calculating projectile velocity and leading targets.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nobody should be doing this, but okay.

I have to build one of these in my garage before the Chinese do it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

Maybe lock your garage so the Chinese can't get in?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think it’s worrisome because if hobbyist can do this, imagine what professionals with more time and money can do

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

He's not just any hobbyist. He's a professional. A literal engineer according to the article.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I misread the headline and thought it was saying the guy was some sort of militant centrist. 🤣

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The militant centrist symbol is Jon Stewart wearing a Che Guevara hat. The T-shirt is only available in extra medium.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

Gavin’ll be happy about the size, at least.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

What's the point of it? "Hi ChatGpt, the Russian enemy is like 10 degrees on the left and a bit further down from the currently aimed position. Maybe 12 degrees... Just shoot 100 times and vary the x and y degree by a radom value between 0 and 5 degrees with steps of 0.1 degrees each time based on a secure RNG, so you maybe hit the enemy. If you hit, I'm gonna tell you and give you further instructions. If not, repeat in an loop, but break out of it after 5 minutes."

After you explained it what to to, the enemy already took your position and is confused what that thing in front of them is, so maybe put a bomb below it and activate it remotely...

Seems to be the least useful AI assisted killing machine possible.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

It's a tech demo. It's not made to be practical. It is made to spur the imagination.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I feel like the next headline is going to be, "AI-Assisted Rifle Robot Shoots Hobbyist by Mistake."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

ChatGPT: "Yes... mistake..."

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I mean, you could probably just do this with openCV for aiming and Kaldi or Julius for voice commands.

Why is an LLM needed for this at all?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Yeah, it's not particularly interesting or impressive. We've been able to do this for years, just in the news cause it plays into a lot of people's fears about AI.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

I was thinking about this movie just the other day. I had no idea that was Jack Black.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This should have the turret voice from Portal.

"Hellooo... Is there anybody there?"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

“I’m different!”

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"We’re under attack from the front left and front right. Respond accordingly"

slow-clap

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago

I thought this as well... if "front" here means "Alt" then absolutely.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I'm glad I could help!