Shit like this just screams "bad company" to an applicant. Especially since some companies are always hiring because of tax breaks and other shady benefits, not because of actual openings. Such a waste.
Mildly Infuriating
Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating.
-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.
-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
Fun fact: this is for a UK civil service position.
Doesn't surprise me. The US Federal government used to have a similar application process where you had to write what amounted to a small essay explaining your knowledge, skills, and abilities.
us gov is very similar. I to keep on thinking it feels like some sort of high school thing.
I thought the web page layout looked familiar.
Move along, move along. Nothing to see here, guvnah.
What they expect from this question? Some human is supposed to read this? Filling useless forms like those is the perfect job for a LLM
This is 100% what I went through for my gov job, way back. It was dumb then, and it's dumb now.
And they still do that. One of my contract peers got a gov spot a few years ago, and I guess making everyone do that rinkydink shit is how they kept it 'fair'.
I seem to hear of this 'behavioural' style a lot at unionized shops, and I really think it's to avoid challenges and backlash.
I took a class on behavioral interviewing back when I was a food service general manager. It was very different from the question on the form above. I had to interview a lot of people. Hundreds over the years.
The essence of behavioral interviewing is actually very simple.
Rather than ask "Can you tell me about your leadership abilities?"
You ask "Can you tell me about a time when you used your leadership abilities to overcome a problem?"
Most of the time they will answer as if you asked the first question. Let them finish or wait for a pause, then say "What I'd really like to know is if you can tell me about one specific example of when you used your leadership abilities."
You can encourage them to provide an answer by saying "This doesn't have to be about work, it could be from a family situation, something from your community life, or something from school."
I think it is very effective.
Maybe it's so they know that they applicant can deal with tedious, unnecessary processes.
This type of question is common during the interview phase. It's usually used (by the applicant) to show leadership and accountability.
It's weird to see it as part of the application phase. I guess it's just front-loading the questions, but it does feel like "jump through our hoops"
Agreed. This during the initial phase seems like they're trying to avoid having a human listen to it.