SnotFlickerman

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago

It was right there!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago

A union is only as good as its members.

Got a union with a lot of real selfish shitheads? You're gonna have a shitty union.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was an attempt at a joke, but thanks for the explainer.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The audit details and whitepaper details are far beyond my capabilities to understand. Can anyone with knowledge of the field tell us about the findings? If you would be so kind, please and thank you.

Good on them for getting an audit and making the code publicly auditable, but I really would like to hear an opinion from some folks who are more involved in cryptography on whether this is Discord being genuine and doing the right thing, or is it Discord trying to use Public Relations and weasel words to make it seem like they're doing the right thing.

It's just hard to trust a private company's motives sometimes, but that doesn't mean they're not capable of doing the right thing. Thanks to anyone who can give some input on this.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Yet somehow still so poor they have to turn to stealing and eating cats.

It's like a superposition of a superposition.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Have you ever worked in a corporation or in government? Even moreso, have you ever worked at a secured facility of any type?

You don't just get to install whatever the fuck you want on machines, you know? They have to go through a process, and since this is a government organization, if the law doesn't allow them to install something like that on a thin client, it's kind of pointless to reference.

I've worked a shitty corporate job where I basically had no power and I had to get approval from a couple different teams for something like Microsoft PowerToys, which is free and made by Microsoft.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Does OnlyOffice run on Swintec typewriters? How many people are going all-in on not reading the article today?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I’m betting the budget isn’t the problem.

Jesus ya think? Is today "everyone painfully obviously didn't read the article and commented anyway" day?

Just quoting myself here:

They’re promoting new legislation to allow the libraries to allow modern equipment and not just typewriters.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

Does Libre Office run on Swintec typewriters?

Because the issue is they're not even allowed a PC, the budget only allows typewriters.

They even point out in the article that a new Swintec technically costs more than a new, crummy laptop.

They're promoting new legislation to allow the libraries to allow modern equipment and not just typewriters.

Further, since it's a Correctional Facility library, there's gonna be strict controls and even if they wanted Libre Office instead of Microsoft Office they would have to put in a formal request for it and then have various security teams deciding whether it was safe to use or not, even though it is technically free. I mean, that goes for pretty much any government job or corporate job, too. They don't usually let people install whatever they want on government or corporate networks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, yes, my favorite activity at parties, looking at some weirdos trash collection.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

It's called a joke. We're in a sub called "programmer humor." You must be fun at parties.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)
 

Copied from Reddit's /r/cscareerquestions:

The US Department of Labor is proposing a rule change that would add STEM occupations to their list of Schedule A occupations. Schedule A occupations are pre-certified and thus employers do NOT have to prove that they first sought American workers for a green card job. This comes on the heels of massive layoffs from the very people pushing this rule change.

From Tech Target:

The proposed exemption could be applied to a broad range of tech occupations including, notably, software engineering -- which represents about 1.8 million U.S. positions, according to U.S. labor statistics data -- and would allow companies to bypass some labor market tests if there's a demonstrated shortage of U.S. workers in an occupation.

Currently the comments include heavy support from libertarian think tank, Cato, and the American Immigration Lawyers Association

The San Francisco Tech scene has been riddled with CEOs whining over labor shortages for the past few months on Twitter/X amidst a sea of layoffs from Amazon, Meta, Google, Tesla, and much more. Now, we know that it's an attempt at influencing the narrative for these rule changes.

If you are having a hard time finding a job, now, this rule change will only make things worse.

From the US Census Bureau:

Does majoring in STEM Lead to a STEM job after graduation?

The vast majority (62%) of college-educated workers who majored in a STEM field were employed in non-STEM fields such as non-STEM management, law, education, social work, accounting or counseling. In addition, 10% of STEM college graduates worked in STEM-related occupations such as health care.

The path to STEM jobs for non-STEM majors was narrow. Only a few STEM-related majors (7%) and non-STEM majors (6%) ultimately ended up in STEM occupations.

If you or someone you know has experienced difficulty finding an engineering job post graduation amidst this so called shortage, then please submit your story in the remaining few days that the Public comment period is still open (ends May 13th.)

Public comment can be made, here:

https://www.regulations.gov/document/ETA-2023-0006-0001/comment

Please share this with anyone else you feel has will be affected by this rule change.

549
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Edward Zitron has been reading all of google's internal emails that have been released as evidence in the DOJ's antitrust case against google.

This is the story of how Google Search died, and the people responsible for killing it.

The story begins on February 5th 2019, when Ben Gomes, Google’s head of search, had a problem. Jerry Dischler, then the VP and General Manager of Ads at Google, and Shiv Venkataraman, then the VP of Engineering, Search and Ads on Google properties, had called a “code yellow” for search revenue due to, and I quote, “steady weakness in the daily numbers” and a likeliness that it would end the quarter significantly behind.

HackerNews thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40133976

MetaFilter thread: https://www.metafilter.com/203456/The-core-query-softness-continues-without-mitigation

view more: next ›