SnotFlickerman

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (5 children)

true, but Lemmy is at least pseudo-anonymous.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Well, as I get older, it's less "party every day" and more "have a wonderful... Time. Is that it?"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

Wouldn't work, unlike the Protestants, who all had their own interpretations of the Bible, so they had to learn to not persecute each other...

Corporations, capitalists, and the people they've bought in government are all on the same page worshiping the Almighty Dollar and it's Holy Book, Modern Monetary Theory.

You'll find the economics discipline frighteningly dogmatic and unwilling to adapt to new information or accept that accepted theories may be flat out wrong.

[–] [email protected] 66 points 5 days ago (4 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago (10 children)

better get more equipment for it before the tariffs kick in

[–] [email protected] 58 points 6 days ago (19 children)

Well, and with the Trump admin incoming: they're not wrong. The FCC will probably be gone within two years.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Well he's going to make it nigh-impossible to afford electronic equipment or compute power.

Piracy may be fine, but the tools that facilitate it will be broken.

Get what you can now, and embrace the return to sneakernets.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"Windows Intelligence" is an oxymoron, just like whoever came up with this rebranding.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
 

Copied from Reddit's /r/cscareerquestions:

The US Department of Labor is proposing a rule change that would add STEM occupations to their list of Schedule A occupations. Schedule A occupations are pre-certified and thus employers do NOT have to prove that they first sought American workers for a green card job. This comes on the heels of massive layoffs from the very people pushing this rule change.

From Tech Target:

The proposed exemption could be applied to a broad range of tech occupations including, notably, software engineering -- which represents about 1.8 million U.S. positions, according to U.S. labor statistics data -- and would allow companies to bypass some labor market tests if there's a demonstrated shortage of U.S. workers in an occupation.

Currently the comments include heavy support from libertarian think tank, Cato, and the American Immigration Lawyers Association

The San Francisco Tech scene has been riddled with CEOs whining over labor shortages for the past few months on Twitter/X amidst a sea of layoffs from Amazon, Meta, Google, Tesla, and much more. Now, we know that it's an attempt at influencing the narrative for these rule changes.

If you are having a hard time finding a job, now, this rule change will only make things worse.

From the US Census Bureau:

Does majoring in STEM Lead to a STEM job after graduation?

The vast majority (62%) of college-educated workers who majored in a STEM field were employed in non-STEM fields such as non-STEM management, law, education, social work, accounting or counseling. In addition, 10% of STEM college graduates worked in STEM-related occupations such as health care.

The path to STEM jobs for non-STEM majors was narrow. Only a few STEM-related majors (7%) and non-STEM majors (6%) ultimately ended up in STEM occupations.

If you or someone you know has experienced difficulty finding an engineering job post graduation amidst this so called shortage, then please submit your story in the remaining few days that the Public comment period is still open (ends May 13th.)

Public comment can be made, here:

https://www.regulations.gov/document/ETA-2023-0006-0001/comment

Please share this with anyone else you feel has will be affected by this rule change.

548
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Edward Zitron has been reading all of google's internal emails that have been released as evidence in the DOJ's antitrust case against google.

This is the story of how Google Search died, and the people responsible for killing it.

The story begins on February 5th 2019, when Ben Gomes, Google’s head of search, had a problem. Jerry Dischler, then the VP and General Manager of Ads at Google, and Shiv Venkataraman, then the VP of Engineering, Search and Ads on Google properties, had called a “code yellow” for search revenue due to, and I quote, “steady weakness in the daily numbers” and a likeliness that it would end the quarter significantly behind.

HackerNews thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40133976

MetaFilter thread: https://www.metafilter.com/203456/The-core-query-softness-continues-without-mitigation

view more: next ›