this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
514 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59466 readers
3684 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Note: Original report by Bloomberg, article by Reuters proxied by Neuters to bypass paywall.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 11 points 41 minutes ago

They can just wait it out until it becomes the corpo-friendly Dept. of Injustice on Jan. 20th.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

How do you force someone to sell something thats open source?

Can the government please force me to sell my open source software too? If they could be my sales department, I'd love that. Pretty please.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 30 minutes ago

Chromium is open source, Google bases their Chrome off of it, but Chrome is not open source.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 minutes ago

Chrome isn't open source?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Better hurry, Trump's rubber stamp DOJ will kill this faster than a cop encountering a dog.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 53 minutes ago

For the right price.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Sprint merged with TMobile

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

And whoever buys it won't also have some kind of ulterior motive? Chrome isn't likely to be a money-maker on its own. If it were, Firefox would have less trouble staying afloat. Anyone who buys Chrome most likely will have plans for it that are no more in the end-user's best interest than Google's.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's not about dispelling any ulterior motive. The idea of anti-monopoly enforcement actions is that if the "business ecosystem" is good and healthy, then other companies who don't own Chrome will be able to compete with whoever owns Chrome, giving the consumer choice that people who like the free market say will reduce consumer exploitation. (If you can't tell from my tone, I am dubious, at best, of this logic)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

Yeah any company controlled by the rich will act immorally

We can at least make sure it's multiple companies who will fight each other instead of one supreme leader megacorp

[–] [email protected] 54 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

This seems like a sensible consumer protection to not let the ad company control the biggest web browser. I won't hold my breath, but I'm glad they are trying something.

AWS should also be split from Amazon.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Google: Sure, we'll sell it to anyone who pays off our Russian Govt fine.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What Lemmy client do you use?

I am asking because it caught my attention that you didn't upvote your own comment.

Also, funny reference 😂

[–] [email protected] 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The Lemmy web client, same as Reddit, allows you to de-upvote your posts.
It feels weird to upvote your own post anyway and I don't do so unless I am asking for help and want it seen more, urgently.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That is so odd, if you dont think what you are saying is relevant or necessary why say it?

Your conscientiousness will be lost in a sea of others self importance, at least level the playing field and support yourself.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

if you dont think what you are saying is relevant or necessary why say it?

If I worried about necessity, I would probably not have a Lemmy account.

level the playing field

I'm not playing dependent upon others, just upon my own ideals. I feel like an upvote needs to mean something. In my case, it means, I need more people to see it, for me.
In most cases, the feeling behind my posts/comments are: If someone sees it, good, have fun.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago (5 children)

Your own upvote on your own comment doesn’t mean anything, because every single comment starts with one upvote by default, not zero. All you’re doing is moving your comments below everyone else’s.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It will never happen. But it would be a good thing for the openness of the web. More Firefox, less Chrome.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

Yep.

Tech companies have extreme "Fuck You" money. They have learned a lot from the past two decades of Antitrust acts.

That politician is either going to quickly change their mind with some bribes, or watch their entire life disappear with an army of lawyers or paid off peers shutting them down.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it put Firefox on a pickle? Say Chrome gets bought out of Google's hands, would they still bother to pay half a billion to Firefox to stay as the default search engine? Could Firefox survive being financially independent?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 hours ago

I'd assume they would be willing to pay even more.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 55 minutes ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago
load more comments
view more: next ›