Ask Lemmy

26858 readers

2122 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Are there any PC emulators for x86 that can be configured to emulate hardware flaws such as the faulty original Pentium FDIV instruction? (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I know this would basically be a useless feature, except for scientific curiousity. I think it could be interesting to some people to see first hand what sort of errors that old faulty CPUs would produce.

Emulators for other faulty platforms might be interesting too. Not like I'd expect any programmers out there to deliberately write faulty instructions though, except as stated, something of a scientific exercise.

Just curious honestly.

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I would solve this problem with QEMU and change the definition of the instruction to generate IR for the flawed behavior. I would force it to use software emulation of course as this would no longer properly be the x86 architecture.

I don’t know of any software that does that by default.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Of course I wouldn't expect any emulator to run faulty instructions by default, but it seems to me that it would be an interesting option for digital historians to study, if for no other reason than shits and giggles..

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

This might be something PCem can do. LTT talked about it for emulating PC hardware (here) to install and play MS-DOS games accurately. I see someone in the PCem forum 10 years ago mentioning the recreation of FDIV bugs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Qemu, i386 target, not sure if they use TCG for that, they probably do, basically have a specific machine model that handles fdiv with a lookup table or something, honestly not sure how it went wrong.