this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
365 points (92.7% liked)

Technology

59440 readers
5532 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

How many duplicated apps are installed on modern Samsung's?

How many browsers? How many app stores? How many games?

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Here's all the Samsung stuff on my Galaxy Fold 4, two of which aren't ones that it came with:

It's really not a problem nor that bad. I chucked them into a folder and have only touched them to use the files app or manage Good Lock.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

So if we're including what Google gives us, that's two app stores, Two browsers, Two note takers. Two messaging apps. Stuff for Samsung TV, Smart things, both useless to me. HP printing app for some reason. Samsung "news" (lol). AR zone (whatever the fuck that is).

I wonder how bloated the launcher is...

Literally none of that ads any value to a "stock Google Android" installation. It's all bloat and crap. Arguably even the stock experience is not bloat free; this just makes it much worse.

And that's only the stuff you see. God knows what other services and background shit is also running, sucking up resources and your battery life.

Yeah, it's no better than it used to be. The talking point is still relevant and any assertion to the contrary is invalid.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)