this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2023
902 points (96.6% liked)

Memes

45666 readers
960 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Bruh, I don't even have a monitor that can display 120fps, and you want that as a minimum?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point is not that, but that modern games are super wasteful with computing resources.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both are valid, I don't know why people want low framerates when we can have silky smooth ones.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is not like we want low framerates, it is just that we don't want to pay for the hardware to run those when regular framerate is more than enough.

60 fps is plenty for every game genre. You only need more if you are a professional gamer, or can splash the cash because you play all night every night.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I don't want to pay for the hardware either. I have an old 750 Ti, and you would be surprised how many (not new) games are running perfectly fine on it. Amount them those like the last deus ex games. I don't remember the framerate I had, but neither do I remember it as an unplayable laggy mess.

When I read that CS2 barely manages to run on a 2060 or some other powerhouse (in my eyes at least, but honestly for some reason I have the impression that 20xx is not much of a leap from let's say a 1080 Ti) I can't think anything else but that the game is a totally wasteful garbage technically.