this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
322 points (98.5% liked)

United Kingdom

4781 readers
598 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Kate Wilson won a legal battle against the Metropolitan Police after discovering her long-term boyfriend was an undercover officer

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

This is awful, but I wonder what is technically illegal about it. It is a misleading and manipulative lie, but it's not illegal to lie about personal topics, I don't think.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The legal battle was a civil suit, based more on the violations of Kate Wilson's human rights, than on the legality of actions

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

That makes sense, I agree with that.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 18 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If a woman has sex with me (hypothetically) because she saw me wearing expensive clothes, but later it turns out they were cheap imitations, that would be misleading, but not rape.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 hours ago

Maybe, when you start arguing that an immoral act is not technically rape, you should simply not do that.

Rape by deception is rape, plain and clear. Why did you pick a scenario where you didn't lie, and try to compare it to someone who spun up an entirely new person out of thin air?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

As horrible this is (as owl said) how do you figure out it is rape?

Edit: fucking sorry for asking a question, that's too much for you it seems. "Everything is rape" isn't the answer ffs.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_deception

False name, false life story, false reason for having sex with her. He had sex with her in order to spy on her.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 12 hours ago

I agree with you. If being misleading is equal to rape, then this rule can easily be abused.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 15 hours ago

It's sex under false pretences and deception. That's a legally defined rape.