this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
23 points (96.0% liked)

UK Politics

3710 readers
237 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The UK government approved $169m worth of military equipment to Israel in the three months that followed the Labour government’s partial suspension of arms exports over concerns they could be used unlawfully in Gaza.

Export data released on Thursday shows that 20 different licences in categories such as military aircraft, radars, targeting equipment, and explosive devices, were approved between October and December 2024.

Arms campaigners say the three-month total is more than what was approved altogether under the Tory government between 2020 and 2023, and said the increase was “truly shocking”.

“This is the Labour government aiding and abetting Israel’s genocide in Gaza,” said Emily Apple, media coordinator for the UK-based Campaign Against Arms Trade.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I know we know where some of the parts are ending up.

But our options are:

  • Ignore everything and continue selling to Israel regardless.

  • Stop direct sales to Israel, but remain part of programmes like the F35 programme, which countries like the US, Germany, Italy, Israel are in. (This is what we have done, the headline and article is misleading)

  • Stop sales to Israel and also abruptly leave any any military partnerships they are also signed up to. This would lead not only to the UK not being able to defend itself and its neighbours properly because we wouldn't be able to build and maintain our jets, but we'd also have to pay billions in exit fees, we'd torch our relationship with the other countries in the scheme, and it'd show the world the UK is not a country you can count on for strategic and manufacturing partnerships, meaning that we'd lose out for decades and our defence sector would be seriously harmed.

Look, I get you want to be ideologically pure, but that final option is obviously not a sensible one. We live in a world where there are shades of grey, not just black and white, and that means sometimes you have to pick the lesser of two evils.

Going forward, we shouldn't get into partnerships that include Israel. Thankfully that appears to be the case with our upcoming GCAP 6th gen jet (UK, Japan, Italy).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I don't think you understand. The genocide convention doesn't excuse war-crimes if arms are sent through a third party.

If the UK starts sending weapons to Kazachstan which then gives them to Russia, and it is brought to the UK's attention that Kazachstan is sending the weapons to Russia, do you think that "no we're sending them to Kazachstan" is an acceptable excuse?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's not a like for like comparison, because we aren't selling weapons to Israel or sending them through another country, we're just in the F35 programme.

I get it, if you were PM (you claim) you'd drop out of the F35 programme, despite it being an absolutely tremendously expensive move that would also leave us extremely vulnerable in terms of defence and ability to defend others. You'd piss off allied countries that we have defence pacts with, as well as others in the F35 programme. You'd signal to the world that Britain is not to be trusted and should never be entered into a defence agreement with, something that would cause permanent irreparable damage to us.

In the meantime, Israel would still get to maintain their planes. But critically, you'd get to feel righteous, and that's what's more important.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The F35 programme is not a magic wand which absolves all complicity in war crimes. There's a reason the UK denies that Israel is committing genocide.

Kid Starver is not doing this out of strategic importance. He got his position by kicking out Corbyn for being anti Israel.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just a PSA but @[email protected] is a troll. In case you wanted a chat about real solutions and policy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This guy is a self admitted troll who got mad at me for saying genocide denial is bad and is now stalking me around Lemmy

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

got mad at me for saying genocide denial is bad and

Trolling. No one denied such or was calling you out for that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

You are indeed trolling, hence the following me around and lying about me. Days later and you're still so mad about being told genocide denial is bad.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Look, I get you want to be ideologically pure, but that final option is obviously not a sensible one. We live in a world where there are shades of grey, not just black and white, and that means sometimes you have to pick the lesser of two evils.

I don't think any sane person could look at the that final option and say that it's worse than participating in active genocide.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We aren't participating in genocide. Israel is participating in genocide.

By this definition of participating in genocide, we're participating in genocide any time we trade with China, too.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

"we aren't involved in the Holocaust, we're just selling the Nazis Zyklon B" (and you're also flying surveillance aircraft over Gaza for Israel)

And China hasn't killed tens of thousands of Muslims, so no.