this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2025
1103 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

68639 readers
5914 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 162 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I'm genuinely surprised Trump killed the CHIPS act, when he could've let that roll through and taken credit for it as the whole POINT of that was to improve US manufacturing.

Also reintroduce the build back better with whatever re-branding.

If he were truly interested in american manufacturing he'd have gone all in on these.

But no. he wants company owners and worldl eaders to come to him and beg for exemptions.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 days ago

He wants to get rid of everything associated with bEYEden and also wants to stick it to CHAIna.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm not surprised.

The name of the game here is to destroy America, not build it up. (Russia wants a USSR-style fall of America. The Cold War never ended for them.) And Trump wants to stay out of jail. Everything you see Trump or his admin doing can be attributed to those two things. Destroying America, or keeping himself out of Jail.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Eh, I think it's more that Trump wants attention. The CHIPS act is bad because Biden gets credit for it, not Trump. Tariffs are good because Trump gets to force other countries to come to the US to negotiate with him. Whether the deal at the end is good or bad is irrelevant, what matters is that Trump's name is in the news and attached to those deals.

Trump isn't going to jail, so I highly doubt he cares much about avoiding it. He mostly cares about people talking about him, and it's working.

I think Musk is the same way, but he does seem to care about the tech his name is attached to as well. So that's likely to cause huge issues soon as Musk and Trump butt heads more and more.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Even if he had gone all in on manufacturing, it's not like a supply network of industrial goods can be built in a day. Hell, it's hard to build that in a 4-year term. Trump is virtue signalling while at the same time jeopardizing any chance America had of reshoring.

It's honestly infuriating me how big projects needed to improve our infrastructure take years and years to complete, when from one administration to the next, those same projects can be cancelled.

It takes multiple presidencies to build something good, and it takes one to tear it all down.

I see now the benefits of China's 5 year plans with how well organized they can control their economy.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago

Trump is a personality cult. It's not rational and whatever. It's about him and always has been.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm surprised that people like you are still surprised at what Trump does.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Understanding Trump is simple: he's a narcissist. For example, if the CHIPS act succeeds, Biden gets credit, so it's bad. It's really quite simple.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Right, basically renamed. Trump wants the for credit. His opposition to Obama and Biden isn't over policy, but that his name isn't on it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

And what is THAT supposed to be?

I've been screaming about the republicans since they made it clear they were going for pure obstructionism with Obama.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'd have to look into it more, but my gut tells me the CHIPS act & 'Build Back Better' was filled to the brim with pork & bullshit. You'd have to parse through, line by line, and take out all the shit. And hope all the changes get passed & implemented, and of course you're still touting the worthless name of a project that your people hate that you didn't even create. Or just blindly trust your opponent's judgment calls & let it roll through, based on "just trust me, bro". Nooooo thank you. Why bother?

With stuff like this, it tends to be easier & more expedient to take it behind the shed & shoot it. Replace it with your distinctly different, branded equivalent.

However. If this is true, it appears that Trump didn't fully raze the CHIPS act & merely revamped it, is taking credit for it. Like you said. CHIPS must have been pretty true to cause.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Oh I'm sure there was pork there, but to just dismissi t out of hand is kinda disengenouls especially when all the politicians (mostly republican) that voted against it tried snapping up credit come time for the ribbon cutting and new construction to aged infrastructure.

Granted Manchan and Senna opposed the build back better initiative and both were explicitely paid off by fossil fuel industry wonks... And i figure if they're in opposition, 'I want it even more out of sheer fucking spite to you greedy assholes that make money killing the planet my niece is going to have to live in.'