this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
541 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

68245 readers
6629 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One of the most basic tenets of cybersecurity is that you must “consider your threat model” when trying to keep your data and your communications safe, and then take appropriate steps to protect yourself.

This means you need to consider who you are, what you are talking about, and who may want to know that information (potential adversaries) for any given account, conversation, etc. The precautions you want to take to protect yourself if you are a random person messaging your partner about what you want to eat for dinner may be different than those you’d want to take, if, hypothetically, you are the Secretary of Defense of the United States or a National Security Advisor talking to top administration officials about your plans for bombing an apartment building in Yemen.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 136 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Your threat model is being authoritarian + a moron.

They're using Signal with disappearing messages instead of official channels because they don't want their conversations documented for accountability. It's the same shit they relentlessly blasted Hillary for.

I was most disappointed when I read that he left the group chat. Missed opportunity for some top-class trolling:

We are good on OPSEC

Are you really tho? 👀 🥸 😱

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He was running better OPSEC than the morons in charge.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Well, the bar was low…

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I was most disappointed when I read that he left the group chat. Missed opportunity for some top-class trolling:

Although that may have had him arrested/raided for accessing most secret information he lacks clearance for, so leaving upon finding out it was the real thing and not a joke group was the better move.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He didn't "access" anything, it was sent directly to him.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 days ago

Remember when the Governor of Missouri tried to have a guy arrested for notifying the state of Missouri that they had a breach in one of the state websites, making peoples PII publicly visible?

That's the kind of idiots you're dealing with here. "We added you to a group chat by mistake and it's all YOUR fault."

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But that obviously wouldn't stop them from having him disappeared. Heck I don't even think that's off the table now

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Probably not, especially now that he's leaking the previously undisclosed classified information (that the people involved insisted was not classified). But them's the brakes when you're a journalist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I think even the Trump administration is just about bright enough to realize that disappearing a top journalist wouldn't go well for them. Especially if he never turned up again.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

I really don't think they'd care. Until someone shows them they're not untouchable, why wouldn't they?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The reporter is a former IDF soldier, there is no way he would face any real blowback from Trump. There is a reason they had his number to add to the group and it's because they were already feeding him information. The Atlantic is just a left coded mouthpiece for the State Department.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So your conspiracy is that a left-wing aligned journalist was in the phone of a right-wing politician. Therefore it's his fault he received the information and shouldn't have reported it?

Really? Even the flat Earth people would think that's stupid.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Lol, I didn't say any of that. But it's a fact Goldberg has been a mouthpiece for the State department going back to at least the Iraq war in my opinion. He's not a Trump guy but just doesn't want to piss off any current administration so he won't lose his access.