Technology

64075 readers

6721 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

1183

~~Brother accused of locking down third-party printer ink cartridges via forced firmware updates, removing older firmware versions from support portals~~ [see comments] (www.tomshardware.com)

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

245 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Brother deny the claims:

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/03/brother-denies-using-firmware-updates-to-brick-printers-with-third-party-ink/

via https://startrek.website/comment/15279250

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[+] [email protected] -21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Could this be anything related to government printer tracking requirements?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I believe that only applies to ink jet. You can hardly make secret dots in B&W.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There is something similar for B&W laser printing. Text is never 100% black, but rastered. You can digitally hide a whole lot of information in microraster on a page of printed text.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Text is never 100% black, but rastered.

Does “rastered” mean the image is mapped onto a very fine grid and each square is given a 0-100 value for intensity of ink? I looked it up, and it seemed like the squares are given a binary value, but this is nowhere near my wheelhouse and I’m honestly not sure I understood the Wikipedia page, let alone the references

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

It is actually quite easy: "Black" print does not mean that 100% of all pixels are actually set. Print pixels are never perfect squares, so even if the printer only prints half of the dots, the print is still dark enough. If not, it could print 70% or 80%, but lets stick to 50% for ease of argument.

So instead of

XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXX

it would print

X X X X
 X X X X
X X X X

For you, it would still be a "roughly black" spot (keep in mind these 8x3 pixel are 0.032mm wide and 0.012mm high on good laser printer).

Would you notice if the pattern was slightly different, like

X X X X
 X XX  X
X X X X

Make a bonanza of those small changes nobody can see, and you can hide thosands of bytes of data in those patterns on any printed page.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wait, I thought that's something that only color laser do with yellow toner...

Edit: Possibly