this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
239 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

60450 readers
4578 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A trade group for the adult entertainment industry will appear at the Supreme Court on Wednesday in its challenge to a Texas law that requires pornography sites to verify the age of their users before providing access – for example, by requiring a government-issued identification. The law applies to any website whose content is one-third or more “harmful to minors” – a definition that the challengers say would include most sexually suggestive content, from nude modeling to romance novels and R-rated movies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 day ago (4 children)

The law applies to any website whose content is one-third or more “harmful to minors”

So ... Infowars, Fox News, OAN, Answers in Genesis, JW, Texas.gov ... right?

Or, all the porn sites should just put huge amounts of public domain works and open source repositories on their sites, so that less than one-third is "harmful to minors."

[–] [email protected] 6 points 18 hours ago

Pretty much every social media site would probably count too.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They're the arbiters of what is "harmful to minors".

[–] [email protected] 22 points 23 hours ago

Well yeah, they're experts in hurting children.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, they would just say that those public domain works or open source repositories teach minors undesirable knowledge of some sort or compete with commercial software vendors and/or entertainment providers.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That can be weaponized, though. US government publications are public domain. So is the Bible. We'd at least get to watch members of the Texas government tie themselves into knots worthy of a game of Twister as they try to argue that those texts are harmful on a porn site but not anywhere else.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Who says that they would argue that they are not harmful anywhere else? Remember, the bible used to be only read by priests in Latin and interpreted to the masses and many governments would love to have less transparency as you can see in their opposition to freedom of information type initiatives.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

It isn't in their best interests to threaten the loony Christian sects that are one of the right wing's favourite brainwashing tools. Members of those sects rely on authority figures to "interpret" the Bible for them instead of actually paying attention to its content, but if you try to take it away from them, they'll throw a fit like a toddler does when you take away a toy they've been ignoring. Restricting access to the Bible in the present day would make religious brainwashing more difficult and create more people who actually think for themselves, which is anathema to bad governments like Texas'.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

"Flood the zone with bullshit" can work for both sides.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

4chan will be okay, it hosts /pol/, a nazi board.