this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2024
512 points (98.1% liked)

Memes

45633 readers
1157 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 days ago (2 children)

My memory might be weak on this topic but Microsoft has already went through a lawsuit due to not allowing people to use other browsers. And that case made Bill Gates lose money.

Might be this one: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Microsoft_Corp.?wprov=sfla1

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

Also, not trying to be smart or anything but Microsoft isn’t run by Bill Gates anymore. All these shady things started happening after he left. I think he allowed the Company to buy him out because he was getting too old. I’m not really sure on why he did/allowed that.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satya_Nadella

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 days ago

All these shady things started happening after he left.

Not really, they have a history of this kind of thing. They just calmed down a little between roughly 2005 and 2015.

The big antitrust case when they killed Netscape was in 1998. Bill Gate's deposition from that case is kind of interesting to watch as a historical document. It's on youtube here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL90W55zhFBOuZuhgxBsjpgDy0o3ll1PSz

In that lawsuit their "Embrace Extend Extinguish" strategy in which they tried to smother open standards became public too.

They tried with Java and their J++ language too, but failed luckily. And lost a lawsuit against Sun on the way.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Plenty of shady monopolistic things happened under Gates as well. The original Explorer antitrust lawsuit dates from the late 90s, the ACPI debacle, etc.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I mean it's always been the modus operandi at Micro$oft from day one when they fucked over the guy who wrote DOS.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I know. I am a Linux enthusiast myself. After Sadya got in the position, Microsoft suddenly became to get interested in Linux, contributing to projects and even funding them. But to this day, I still do not trust them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never trust a Big Data Partner. 🤣

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

Unfortunately Linux has tons of them nowadays. Google, Amazon, Microsoft are three of them that I know. And not just in kernel, but they also contribute in other projects in the ecosystem.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

These lawsuits take a long time and cost a fraction of what it would cost them to not do that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Na it's a slap in the wrist. by the way there's more lawsuits and several examples that don't have lawsuits

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I remember this because Bill Gates was literally the richest person at the time but lost his position due to lawsuits like this.