this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
152 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59374 readers
3846 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are two kinds of people, the kind who'll read this and think, "This is science working", and others who'll think "Well, you can't trust science".

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

No there are three. You missed the guy grumbling in the corner about academia being in shambles (in the US at least)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I’m optimistic. I think we’re at the beginning of the self-correction stage of the reproducibility crisis.

It’s not the end. It’s not even the beginning of the end. But it could very well be the end of the beginning.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Something about potential wide scale fraud came out recently about a prominent Alzheimer's researcher. This article covers it quite well: https://www.science.org/content/article/research-misconduct-finding-neuroscientist-eliezer-masliah-papers-under-suspicion

It's grim, especially when considering the real human cost that fraud in biomedical research has. Despite this, like you, I am also optimistic. This article outlines some of how the initial concerns about this researcher was raised, and how the analysis of his work was done. A lot of it seems pretty unorthodox. For example, one of the people who contributed to this work was a "non-scientist" forensic image expert, who goes by the username Cheshire on the forum PubPeer (his real name is known and mentioned in the article, but I can't remember it).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

but I can't remember it

nice one! ;D

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh I agree! I actually have another comment in this thread where I said I think that more people are excited about uncovering fraudulent work than ever before imo.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

in academia, crimes against scientific integrity are considered particularly heinous. The dedicated detectives who investigate these vicious violations are members of an elite squad known as the Ph.D students. These are their stories.