this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
601 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

60052 readers
3783 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I don't think this is true. Most people do care, in my anecdotal experience. I am not in tech circles. It is not a niche thing to be concerned about these days.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Eh, most do care, they just don't do anything about it. My siblings and brothers don't like that companies like Google and Facebook harvest so much data, yet they continue using them.

So whether people care isn't a particularly interesting question, I'm more interested in what people are willing to do about it. Will they change what services they use? Would they change who they vote for (if a party actually prioritized privacy)? How much are they willing to pay to not have data harvested? And so on. Those are interesting questions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Disagree. I think everyone deserves a reasonable degree of privacy and interoperability and choice as a protected right, within the markets and services we already have.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I agree with that as well, I just don't think the average person puts that at the top of their voting priorities, and as such, the major candidates don't say anything about privacy when running for office.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I feel like positioning the 'average person' as always disengaged or never doing enough reads more like an attempt to define in/out groups than a genuine effort to actually do anything about the problem.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Understanding the average person (or rather, the mode of the population on a given topic) helps to craft a strategy. If the average person doesn't prioritize privacy, the solution probably isn't to run a big campaign around a privacy bill, but to attack the issue of privacy at the fringes on things the average person does care about (e.g. right to repair for farmers, cars, and consumer devices; even abortion). You can point to privacy as being the main, underlying theme here, but focus the energy on things that actually have a chance of success.