Memes

45889 readers

1411 users here now

Rules:

Be civil and nice.
Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

708

Amd fan (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

111 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I disagree. Processing power may be similar, but Nvidia still outperforms with raytracing, and more importantly DLSS.

Whats the point of having the same processing power, when Nvidia still gets more than double the FPS in any game that supports DLSS

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

FSR exists, and FSR 3 actually looks very good when compared with DLSS. These arguments about raytracing and DLSS are getting weaker and weaker.

There are still strong arguments for nvidia GPUs in the prosumer market due to the usage of its CUDA cores with some software suites, but for gaming, Nvidia is just overcharging because they still hold the mindshare.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I had the 3090 and then the 6900xtx. The differences were minimal, if even noticeable. Ray tracing is about a generation behind from Nvidia to and, but they're catching up.

As the other commenter said too fsr is the same as dlss. For me, I actually got a better frame rate with fsr playing cyberpunk and satisfactory than I did dlss!