this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
495 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

59421 readers
3034 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (6 children)

"Lemmy CEO teases users with cookies and free subs" would be removed from reddit in 1 second

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Yes, because one is saying positives and the other is saying negatives. “Trump promises project 2025” isn’t a trump ad even if “Harris promises a fucking break from whatever weird bullshit trump said today” wouldn’t be allowed on truth social

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Ads are about exposure too. The word "lemmy" is probably banned on reddit because they don't want you to even mention a competitor or people would know.

When the frontpage is all about trump/harris any party that isn't them lose because they get 0 coverage.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Americans need a run off vote system if they want third parties to be relevant

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Problem is the ones people currently trust to organise, run, certify, and implement the elections do not want third parties to be relevant. Existing powers entrench against any changes that might result in a more fair system because the unfairness is the reason why they are on top.

load more comments (2 replies)