Ask Lemmy

26903 readers

2089 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected]

Rules: (interactive)

1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them

2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?

3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.

4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].

5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.

Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Older women, women with weight changes or visible disabilities, or transfolk of Lemmy - how has the male gaze changed for you? (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

97 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hello ladies (current and former) of Lemmy (current) - I'm curious how your experience of the male gaze has changed as you moved in and out of young-woman-hood.

How has your opinion of being seen changed through this process?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] -4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

From the economic POV I believe it is a good point, but, from the human biological POV I believe people generally need a partner to found real life meaning.

I think there are exceptions to the rule obviously.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

That's not even close to true. Don't believe what Hollywood and Disney are trying to sell. Having a partner doesn't grant meaning or satisfaction with life, nor does not having one bar you from either.

The kind of people who are happy with someone tend to also be the kind of people who are happy single.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Yeah I'm speaking about the generality.. not about a totality.. I'm not talking exactly about happiness I'm talking about life meaning, all living beings are naturally designed to reproduce themselves, I'm not saying that's the only sense of life but definitely continuing the existence of the race it's a big one.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Tbh you sound right out of the 1960s

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Reproducing doesn't grant meaning. Sheesh.