yukijoou

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

I think more and more browsers are spoofing their UA to pretend that you're using windows, for fingerprinting resistance

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago

"AI" today mostly refers to LLMs, and whichever LLM you're using, you'll likely face the same issues (wrong answers creeping in, tending towards mediocrity in its answers, etc.) - those seem to be things you have to live with if you want to use LLMs. if you know you can't deal with it, another rebrand won't help anything

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

wow is me, i am le surprised

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

the avreage person also isn't as convincing as a bot we're told is the peak of computer intelligence

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

there are tons of webring still going these days!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

well, i just tried it, and its answer is meh --

i asked it to transcribe "zenquistificationed" (made up word) in IPA, it gave me /ˌzɛŋˌkwɪstɪfɪˈkeɪʃənd/, which i agree with, that's likely how a native english speaker would read that word.

i then asked it to transcribe that into japaense katakana, it gave me "ゼンクィスティフィカションエッド" (zenkwisuthifikashon'eddo), which is not a great transcription at all - based on its earlier IPA transcription, カション (kashon') should be ケーシュン (kēshun'), and the エッド (eddo) part at the end should just, not be there imo, or be shortened to just ド (do)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

it is absolutely capable to come up with it’s own logical stuff

interesting, in my experience, it's only been good at repeating things, and failing on unexpected inputs - it's able to answer pretty accurately if a small number is even or odd, but not if it's a large number, which indicates it's not reasoning but parroting answers to me

do you have example prompts where it showed clear logical reasoning?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

huh, i kinda assumed it was a term made up/taken by journalists mostly, are there actual research papers on this using that term?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago (15 children)

because it's a text generation machine..? i mean, i wouldn't say i can prove it, but i don't think anyone can prove it's capable of thinking, much less of reasoning

like, it can string together a coherent sentence thanks to well crafted equations, sure, but i wouldn't qualify that as "thinking", though i guess the definition of "thinking" is debatable

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago

New response just dropped

[–] [email protected] 20 points 5 months ago

A/B testing moment

view more: next ›