tgxn

joined a long while from now
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Yeah, steam straight up tells you if games have support for controllers, and they are all plug-and-play...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There is, pretty sure there's a GPO too. There is an option in this debloat tool for it too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah absolutely if he's downloading Linux ISOs, just use a VPN and you'll be fine 99% of the time. TOR if he is doing anything else surrupticiaous. 😬

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Absolutely! Wireguard (for example) uses UDP 51820 (normally) which will mlre than likely be blocked, but that won't stop you from using something like cntlm to proxy it over an allowed port like 443/80. DPI or some intercepting proxies would likely still filter it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Client seperation is implemented by the AP. There's lots of info, it's called client isolation normally. check this out

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Good explanation, a note that most public WiFi will use client separation. Macca's, starbucks, airplanes etc you will only ever see your device and the gateway. (More for other people that are reading, I assume you know this 😄)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It depends on his threat model and what he's trying to hide really. Public WiFi is fine, as long as you validate/check the SSL cert it's using is from your bank and is legitimate. Using public WiFi with a VPN is more secure as long as you trust your VPN provider. If he's asking these questions, then he's probably not doing banking though, and should ideally be using VPN+TOR or something similar.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yes a VPN will hide your IP address from the server you're connecting to. The VPN service will still see your IP and may log/record it. You also have to watch out for things like DNS leaks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah the non-optical, under-screen sensor on my S22 is awesome. I too preferred the side sensor on the power button of my S10e, but gone are the days we get what we want. Or else we'd still have it in the optimal position on the back of the phone.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Thanks, Crowdstrike.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

LMAO they really are inept 🤦‍♂️

view more: next ›