shinratdr

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Agreed, but not requiring labeling or some sort of method to identify was a real fuckup on their part.

My problem isn’t the existence of different tiers of cable, it’s that there is literally no way to know if the cable you’re using supports something until you try it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This is absolutely not a “US under regulation thing”, that makes no sense. What “regulation” would dictate what a connector carries over its cable? That would be compliance with the spec, and the spec is a connector.

USB-C can carry USB 2.0, 3.0, 3.1, 3.2, 4.0, PD, DisplayPort, wattages from 5w to 100w & Thunderbolt 4. No one cable would be required to carry all those or all cables would be $50/ft.

Just because you’ve never encountered a USB-C power only cable doesn’t mean they don’t exist in your country. They’re made by the bucketload in China, and you’ll encounter one soon enough.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago

“I say your purple kitchen goes too far!”

“And I say your purple kitchen doesn’t go too far enough!”

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Alabama

AM

I mean I can’t say 100%, but…

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

RTO/WFH definitely impacts tech workers the most, I think that’s just obvious.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Other things happening now does not mean this is not important right now. If I thought focusing on this was preventing them from doing something about the wars, stopping Trump, or establishing abortion rights, then yeah maybe I would agree.

But we all know they aren’t doing shit about those things. IMO, “what more important things could they be doing” is the wrong question to ask, because it doesn’t function like a priority list where one takes away from their other. If they happen to stumble on an issue that is actually important and prescient, which this is, albeit framed poorly, then I say let them go for it. At least some actual good might come of it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago

Agreed, but it was, so it’s still important.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Bones are their money…

[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

If you genuinely want to know the history & evolution of Fastpass and why it is the way it is: https://youtu.be/9yjZpBq1XBE

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

WeChat is an anomaly and not proof of anything. It only works in China because the Chinese government controls who can and can’t operate, and thus can pick winners and losers.

If suddenly everyone with a better take on a service that a theoretical X “everything app” offered couldn’t operate without applying for a license and possibly never getting it or having to find a domestic partner to operate in every country they want to do business in, then yeah this X app would take off, because it would be essentially the only option.

Since that will never happen, then an everything app will never exist outside of countries that exercise end-to-end control. This is also why American tech companies outside of entrenched operating system vendors and hardware companies (think Apple & Microsoft) have a hard time making inroads there. Because if you get too popular and it’s something they can copy, then suddenly the Chinese copy gets all the market advantage and boatloads of funding, and you get shut out.

view more: ‹ prev next ›