this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
665 points (98.0% liked)

Memes

45655 readers
1695 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 46 points 8 months ago (12 children)

Doesn’t matter much. Is it a 7.5W cable, or maybe a 15W, 45W, 60W, 100W, 140W or 240W cable ? Does it support USB 2.0 (480Mbps), 3.1 gen1 (5Gbps), 3.1 gen2 (10Gbps), does it support Thunderbolt, and if so the 20Gbit or 40Gbit version ? Does it support DisplayPort alt mode?

You can’t tell any of this from looking at the cable. It’s a terrible mess.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (11 children)

The worst part is, I could accept that as a generational flaw. The newer ones get better, the olds ones lying around do less. OK, that’s the beast of progress.

But no. They still make cables today that do power only. They still do cables that do everything except video. Why? Save a couple cents. Make dollars off multiple product lines, etc. Money.

What could have been the cable to end all cables…just continued to make USB a laughing stock of confusion.

Don’t even get me started on the device side implementations…

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago (9 children)

That’s because it doesn’t make sense to use an €40 cable when a €1 cable would do.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Agreed, but not requiring labeling or some sort of method to identify was a real fuckup on their part.

My problem isn’t the existence of different tiers of cable, it’s that there is literally no way to know if the cable you’re using supports something until you try it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Agreed, but not requiring labeling or some sort of method to identify was a real fuckup on their part.

Yeah, we used to have that. It was great. They even made it so you couldn’t even fit the wrong cable in a port. They did that by having different connectors for different cables.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah but with modern thin & light mobile devices, that’s a bad solution. Then you need multiple holes to serve multiple purposes, which impacts waterproofing and requires extra space & hardware.

One port to rule them all makes sense. But it should have had a way to identify cables capability at a glance. I still prefer having one cable that can charge all my devices, even if the trade off is some confusing situations when it comes to cable capability.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Is this true? There's no app to test these by plugging them into your phone? No chip in them that encodes a spec sheet?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)