rivermonster

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

But theyre not recycled much--YET.

Agree and excitedly look forward to growth in that market (or even having a market for it). They will eventually become a profitable recycling opportunity. Unless one of the other battery techs (tons of them) in development just completely supplanted them. Either way the impact should diminish over time. Main questions are how fast and long will they continue to be an environmental negative.

Rechargeable nickel–cadmium (Ni-Cd), nickel metal hydride (Ni-MH), lithium-ion (Li-ion) and nickel–zinc (Ni-Zn), can also be recycled. Disposable alkaline batteries make up the vast majority of consumer battery use, but there is currently no cost-neutral recycling option.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battery_recycling

EDIT: You can read further down how close some of these companies are to an actual recycling center. They're getting there!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

After the upcoming Civil War. I'm not advocating for it, but I definitely think it's inevitable.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I seriously can't recommend Kagi enough! Make an account and do a hundred searches (FREE) that aren't monetized and/or used to advertise to you or steal your data. It's incredible what a difference it makes.

https://kagi.com/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

When a fact looks like propaganda to you, then you need to recognize the red flag and seek self improvement.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

I still support moving this direction because it creates the necessary infrastructure that can be leveraged by newer battery tech. And likely even with the batteries, it’s better than diesel.

I don't know how to help you read.

You sound like a demagog who feels attacked when faced with facts or genuine issues. Advocating for improvements to the technology isn't being anti-EV or even anti-battery. LOL. #faceplam&sigh

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

EDIT: Why on earth are people downvoting improving battery technology? LMFAO, sometimes this place is batshit crazy.

There's research into many different formulations that don't use nearly as much (or in some cases any) toxic materials, solid-state batteries, etc.

Are you taking the critique personally? If so, that's a misunderstanding. It's not an attack on you.

It's simply a fact there's a LONG way to go on battery tech, and anything we can do to increase power density while decreasing weight is critical to making them more environmentally friendly and sustainable.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Appreciate you taking the time to help me understand.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Thank you for the response!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

It seems like a potential scalability issue, and a lot of work. Props to the administrators who deal with this right now.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

So basically a silk road alternative, but not really because it would be much easier to track down and remove a node? Or is it possible to also hide a node and rely on forcing de-federation?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago

For a free throw example, because it shouldn't become a go-to for child pornography.

 

Even if it's just a recommendation on a different group in which to ask the question, I'm curious how Lemmy combats criminal activity and content like human trafficking, smuggling, terrorism, etc?

Is it just a matter of each node bans users when they identify a crime, and/or problematic nodes are defederated if they tolerate it?

And if defederated, does that mean each node has to individually choose to defederate from the one allowing criminal activity?

view more: next ›