riccardo

joined 5 years ago
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It still requires a phone number to sign up, but you don't need to share it to chat with someone

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

"Mulatto" is also an Italian word, it means the same thing. As someone already said up in the thread, nobody uses it as a slur, but I didn't know about its etymology. I still won't judge anyone that uses it, but I can understand how someone might not feel ok with being addressed with that word

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

if you need a consent-or-pay example, just open La Repubblica's homepage. You will be prompted with the "accept all cookies or pay" prompt as soon as you open the site. Pretty standard practice for most Italian online newspapers, sadly

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I'm still trying to figure it out, but I guess not. The only thing I'm sure about is that you will know whether the OTP code has been sent by Telegram or a P2PL relay

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

You can decide to send sms codes only within your country. You decide whether the tradeoff between costs, privacy and features is worth it. Sending 150 sms a month (or a magnitude more) would cost me 0 €. I find some of the premium features worth paying for. But I would never relay OTP codes for telegram

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Especially since they are aiming the service to improve sign-up reliability in countries that block telegram

It's mainly to offload the cost of sending verification codes via sms to users, which is one of the costs that Telegram wants to cut. As far as I remember, it amounts to, like, 7% of all their annual expenses (I will source this later). A couple of years ago they decided not to send sms verification codes when you sign in from a third-party app, and just send the code to active session. This sounds like recipe for moderation headaches and privacy disasters, but also good way to boost their premium metrics :)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It's opt-in, of course

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I've just tried to sign up from Firefox 122 and it worked. No captcha or other kinds of anti-bot puzzle to solve

[–] [email protected] 35 points 10 months ago

So it begins

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Tried to open that webpage but godaddy asks me if I want to buy the domain. Typo?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

From the article:

$100,000 per day for a country with ~5.4 million people is a lot. If even 20 percent used Facebook regularly, then that would still be 10 cents per user per day. It's unlikely that Meta is generating so much profit per user - every day.

This is a reasonable observation and I wonder what Meta would do once one of their services becomes unprofitable in a specific country. Anyway if you add Instagram and WhatsApp to the math, maybe they would still generate profits from the Norwegian userbase

 
 
0
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Keyboards are probably one of the most sensitive apps on our phones, having access and handling practically everything we type. I've stopped using keyboards that require network access and started using only opensource apps a few years ago. What are your favorite, privacy-respecting android keyboards?

So far, I've found these alternatives:

  • AnySoftKeyboard. I've used ASK for years and I've always been very happy with it. Probably the autocorrect could use some improvement. It's definitely the most mature opensource keyboard out there, with the most features and configurations
  • OpenBoard. The one I'm using right now. Easy and fast to configure, quite good auto-correct
  • FlorisBoard. Haven't had the time to try it out extensively so I don't have any opinion about it
  • SimpleKeyboard. It offers the bare minimum one could ask from a keyboard but sometimes you don't actually need more than that
  • AOSP keyboard and LineageOS' fork, that is, the keyboards that come with some ROMs out of the box. They're probably what a lo of people use

These are the alternatives I've been considering. If you know about other opensource keyboards to extend this list, pleas let me know


Pros/cons of each one of the keyboards I've used, based on my usage and preferences:

AFK

  • + the copy/cut/paste tool that I could invoke by swiping up from the space bar
  • + configurable input shortcuts
  • + smaller extra top bar being (and configurable, not just with numbers)
  • + the ability to backup your settings, shortcuts and dictionaries
  • + plenty of themes
  • - maybe the settings are a bit too overwhelming

OpenBoard

  • + it's better at predicting words in my experience (maybe just placebo?)
  • + "drag to delete" gesture on the delete key
  • + configurable input shortcuts
  • + "swipe to move the cursor" gesture on the spacebar
  • - no select/copy/cut/paste tools

FlorisBoard

  • + theme editor
  • + select/copy/cut/paste tools (maybe hidden behind too many taps)
  • + ability to show the numpad using the "dialer layout" instead of having all the numbers on the same row
  • + "drag to delete" gesture on the delete key
  • + "swipe to move the cursor" gesture on the spacebar
  • + actively developed
  • - no autocorrections (yet)
 
 
view more: next ›