Huh, the unethical company that installed known-bad tech into a human is acting unethically. Interesting.
His family should sue them for fraud and whatever crime is to knowingly injure someone with subpar products.
rhadamanth_nemes
joined 1 year ago
They tested on animals, identifying the retraction issue... Then did nothing and installed it into a human anyway.
In your example it'd be shampoo that chemically burns pig scalps that is pushed to market for humans anyway.
Stop being an apologist and think about what it means to have billionaires treating desperate people as guinea pigs for invasive technology testing.
The point being that memorizing complex math is pointless unless you're using it for some sort of day to day.
Out of curiosity, what do you think about the fact that they knew from animal testing that the retraction issue existed, but they installed it into a human anyway?