paintbucketholder

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Not all iMessage features can be mapped to RCS, so unless Apple brings iMessage to other platforms, non-Apple phones will always be associated with an inferior messaging experience.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

Is it intentionally hostile on Apple’s part to bar androids from joining? Yes. But the reactions from Apple users aren’t entirely unjustified

The reaction from Apple users is to blame Android users - which is entirely unjustified.

But of course, post purchase rationalization and brand loyalty play a big part in why people want to externalize blame rather than questioning their own decision or blaming their favorite company for providing a shitty cross-platform messaging experience.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Beeper already deregistered the numbers, but it takes 24 to 36 hours for Apple servers to forget the deregistered numbers.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The two things go hand in hand, though.

Degraded messaging gets branded with green bubbles. Green bubbles - i.e. non-Apple phones - get associated with degraded messaging. Non-Apple phones get pidgeon-holed as crappy phones for messaging. People get bullied into buying iPhones.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It's probably just a definition thing.

To me, constructive criticism means that the criticism doesn't just point out failure, but that it then also shows how to correct that failure.

By itself, "you're doing it wrong" is just destructive: it takes something apart, it destroys it. Without a subsequent "and here's how you would do it right," it doesn't become constructive, it doesn't help in putting things back together in the correct way.

Sure, as a first step, "you're doing it wrong" is completely justified when something is actually wrong.

But without the second step - the constructive part - it just doesn't constitute constructive criticism. By itself, it's just criticism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Is saying "you're doing it wrong" really constructive?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

Yeah, the external fire escapes on the second and third floor would also suggest that it's been subdivided into several apartments.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Roman concrete structures still exist after 2000 years. If you want to "hide" the CO2 somehow, then concrete doesn't seem like a bad idea.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. Wanting a Tesla 5 years ago is very different from still wanting a Tesla today, in 2023, after Elon has told everyone, in public, exactly who he was.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Since you seem to know a lot about Tesla: when people pay those $12,000 for the "Full Self-Driving package," does Tesla tell them they can't use it when it gets cold outside?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (5 children)

These are basically small concrete boxes sunk into the ground. They're only meant to stick out a bushfire for a few hours.

You could probably just keep a few bottles of oxygen or a carbon dioxide scrubber stashed in there, just in case. If you can spend $10,000 on one of these bunkers, spending a few hundred more isn't going to make a difference.

Anything longer than a few hours would get dicey anyway without room to move around, without room to stash water or food, without a toilet or beds.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago (19 children)

There's not one single person in the world who should own a thousand million dollars, never mind hundreds of thousands of millions of dollars.

The pure existence of billionaires is unethical and immoral - doesn't matter whether they're being stupid and fascist in public, or quietly pulling strings and bending society to their will in the background.

view more: next ›