Could they though, I thought signal would just leave the market
otter
Well that's shady
Users and ratings can be bought, so reputation is important.
Even if a piece of software is open source (which this supposedly is), it needs to be well known enough so that professionals are checking the code for vulnerabilities/ bad behaviour.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/addon/ublock-origin/
Ublock Origin has 7 times the number of users anyways?
Hijacked journals are a form of cybercrime in which a malicious third party creates a cloned website to impersonate a legitimate publication. The forgery replicates the original journal’s important details, from its title to its archive and international standard serial number, a code that identifies the publication. The purpose of a hijacking is to generate money quickly by charging illegitimate article-processing fees to unsuspecting researchers. Although the hijackers often publish papers that have been submitted to the fraudulent site, these works are not peer-reviewed nor considered legitimate.
You can actually search Lemmy by adding your instance (or a big instance)
For example:
site:lemmy.ca framework 13
This instance in particular or the fediverse in general?
Yes exactly :) Most clients should support it like that. When in doubt, just use the exclamation point
Additional info:
Some apps will also autocomplete while typing it in, which makes it easier for people on other platforms (ex. Mastodon) to be able to use the link.
For example, here are two versions of the link (with the formatting in this format
so you know what to type)
Plain typed link: [email protected]
[[email protected]](/c/[email protected])
Auto completed link: [email protected]
[[email protected]](https://lemmy.ca/c/communitypromo)
So if you have the option to use auto complete, it might be a bit better. Often I just do the first one
I think they're referring to the "rich cards"
https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2016/05/introducing-rich-cards
I used to find them useful too, but nowadays I find them too unpredictable to be useful. The buttons move around, the UI hides or displays different things, and sometimes they only appear after the page has already loaded so I misclick.
At some point, A/B testing itself becomes the problem. Maybe they need an A/B test to see if they should be doing A/B tests all the time.
Important point, and they also said they didn't plan on supporting Linux.
They're changing things up after being bought up, but I'm not sure if Linux is a priority for them yet
Yep, I'm still suspicious we're in the good phase before things get anti-consumer
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/EncroChat
So this sounds like the ANOM phone story with extra steps?
I get that they can "access" messages, but the headline feels misleading if it requires full access to the device.
It's not that they're breaking encryption or reading messages in transit, it's more like they're installing malware on specific devices so that they can look at your screen?