nulluser

This is what I was thinking at first. This just looks like classic chain letter.

But on rereading, it appears that the person at the top is controlling who's sending books to who, and might even be dictating where you buy the book from, which is definitely a scam.

My guess on how this works. Upon DMing the person in control, you're instructed to buy a book from a specific website (that they control) and have the book shipped directly from there to the "stranger.". However, "stranger" doesn't actually exist, no books are ever sent, and the person running this whole scam is just pocketing the money rubes spend on "books".

Who says it was accidental?

Pro tip: Tar knows what to do if you try to untar a tar.gz file. It Just Works(tm).

My pihole prevents me from knowing what you're talking about.

It selects people who don’t want to change a failing system because they are great at gaming that system.

Reminds me of the current American political system and the politicians it selects for us.

I don't understand why so many people can't just go get their own damn food. Uber eats hasn't been around long enough for you all to have forgotten what you did before, has it? How did you survive back then?

Enshitification

WTF are you talking about? All I'm saying is that if you write code (that in the context of this discussion passes arguments to a method you didn't write, that may not be the type the author of the method expected someone to pass, but really, that's completely beside the point), you should, oh, I don't know, maybe test that it actually works, and maybe even (gasp) write some automated tests so that if anything changes that breaks the expected behavior, the team immediately knows about it and can make appropriate changes to fix it. You don't need a strongly typed language to do any of that. You just need to do your job.

Don't get too excited.

Although the UK government has said that it now won’t force unproven technology on tech companies, and that it essentially won’t use the powers under the bill, the controversial clauses remain within the legislation, which is still likely to pass into law. “It’s not gone away, but it’s a step in the right direction,” Woodward says.

James Baker, campaign manager for the Open Rights Group, a nonprofit that has campaigned against the law’s passage, says that the continued existence of the powers within the law means encryption-breaking surveillance could still be introduced in the future. “It would be better if these powers were completely removed from the bill,” he adds.

But some are less positive about the apparent volte-face. “Nothing has changed,” says Matthew Hodgson, CEO of UK-based Element, which supplies end-to-end encrypted messaging to militaries and governments. “It’s only what’s actually written in the bill that matters. Scanning is fundamentally incompatible with end-to-end encrypted messaging apps. Scanning bypasses the encryption in order to scan, exposing your messages to attackers. So all ‘until it’s technically feasible’ means is opening the door to scanning in future rather than scanning today. It’s not a change, it’s kicking the can down the road.”

I remember a very specific commercial where they were listing stuff that was "on" AOL, most or all of which was just on the broader actual Internet , and then closed with some pitch like, "AOL has things you can't get anywhere else," clearly implying everything they just listed was exclusive to AOL. I couldn't understand why every other ISP wasn't suing them into oblivion for that crap.

From my experience (been to BM a few times, not recently though), most Burners are left of center and would likely accept anthropogenic climate change as real. Likely for political reasons rather than scientific reasons, though, as many of those same Burners would also happily accept that crystals/magnets/heavily diluted water can cure disease and that the positions of nearby planets relative to distant stars from the perspective of Earth combined with how many times the moon had orbited Earth since January 1st on your birthday can vaguely predict what's going to happen to you in the next week or so.