It was already curated pre-Musk, and idgaf about whether or not you or anyone else on this platform has an issue with me still using it to keep up with positive things in spite of him. Lemmy is ok, possibly even fine, but it actually is severely lacking in certain kinds of content, while also having it’s share of negative assholes with their own negative asshole messages.
mateomaui
joined 1 year ago
tbh it’s not that bad for me. Between using a private account, having my feeds tuned, and using autoblockers for magats and crypto shills, I don’t get ads or much of the crazy and/or aggravating shit. I have a feed mostly of art, photography, nature, history, generally interesting stuff and cute animals. If I want politics, I have a list for that.
video calls
The idea I would have to put clothes on to use Twitter is disorienting.
“Accounts you follow” still the best option.
Truly a paradise for my cat
I like how all the carpets look like they have telltale signs of professional cleaning, and then there’s the bathroom carpet.
So that step up to the shower is even more of a bad idea then.
Usually so many bad real estate toilets, and now I just wonder how far away it is.
Likely the only time you’ll have that happen are due to copyright infringement assets, finding extremely objectionable things in it, etc. Even if something was delisted because of expired licensing (see Deadpool, etc), any copies bought before then should still be installable. Like you said, pretty sure any full removal has to be under exceptional circumstances.
I’m going to get fired at for saying this, but websites like that are why I keep Brave around as a last resort news backup. Its reader mode didn’t get past FT, but easily did so for the Economist.
(I don’t need education about Brave, but readers can lodge their complaints and do the token rants right here 👇)