magnetosphere

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why is Telegram "insane"?

Because you get people who think other people’s opinions are “programmed”, or that those people are “brainwashed”.

Telegram serves useful purposes. Unfortunately, it can also be a breeding ground for the tin foil hat folks.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago

On the rare occasions that I’ve dragged out “it is what it is”, I’ve really wanted to say something like neither of us can change it, and instead of working towards a solution, all you’ve done is COMPLAIN for the last hour. Now SHUT UP, accept the situation, and make yourself useful!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"If you can't take me at my worst, you don't deserve me at my best."

I always take that as “l am a garbage person who will abuse you.” It is a MASSIVE red flag.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Huh. You might be right.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Quick guess - as people become enormously successful, the values they had as individuals often fade. Executives forget what it was like to live paycheck to paycheck (assuming they didn’t have rich parents to begin with). They feel less need to hide (or even acknowledge) their flaws, because now they’re making “fuck you” money.

Our society values money over integrity. If you’re rich enough, you can literally get away with murder.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

Me neither. Actually, I didn’t realize Split was in the same “universe” until the very end, when David was watching the news on TV. That was an awesome surprise!

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago (3 children)

For a long time, I would have said Unbreakable. I’m glad that he ended up continuing the story, eventually.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

I’m not trying to. This was MANY years ago, so I’m being cautious (perhaps overly so) with the wording.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I recall hearing something about real arms reduction making nuclear war seem like a sane, viable option.

The theory is that we’re safer if all sides know they can completely annihilate each other. No world leaders genuinely want nuclear war (despite what they say, threaten, or imply), so nobody launches a nuke. Flaw - that theory assumes all leaders are sane and rational.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago

I’ve never posted there, but damn I’m glad I found them. Highly recommended.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I used to be a Boy Scout. That just means I’ll die a bit slower.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

Not to argue, but shit hitting the fan on this scale makes loyalties much harder to predict.

view more: ‹ prev next ›