I get the sentiment, but realistically I'll still pick the random man. A man could kill or rape me. A bear is likely to kill me.
jsomae
joined 8 months ago
If it doesn't get better it will cause unemployment and misinformation.
If it gets a lot better, it will kill everyone single human.
Sierra was a great company, but it's not like pc games wouldn't exist without them. It sucks that there aren't more women in the games industry, though.
Valid rambling, but this is a poor reply to the previous comment.
We're just afraid of what A.I. will be.
Assuming you're using https, your ISP cannot see what pages you visit. It can only see what website you access (IP address).
Anyone know if incogni is legit?
In fairness, I have no idea what I would want from that search query.
What's the original image? She looks cool.
Sucks they were able to find you this way. That's why I always use a pseudonym.
Statistical error. Unlikely to encounter a bear; but per bear encounter, less likely to survive than per men encounter.
Serial killers and rapists are very clever and because there exist serial killers who want to kill indigenous women in the woods, they will likely succeed. Bears have no such desire, and because indigenous women are clever they will avoid the bears.
But I'm willing to bet that the odds of a random man being a rapist/murderer are much lower than a random bear deciding to kill me.
It's hard thing to think about because our brains want to rephrase the situation into taking account how likely it is to encounter men vs bears in the first place. That's why this isn't very applicable to, say, staying safe at night or in bars.
...except it is. This is why, if you have to take a ride home with a strange man, it's much safer to go with an arbitrary man of your choosing than the one who offers.