grysbok

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

The main service my period tracker provides is a notification telling me "hey, it's PMS time. If you're emo it's ok, it's probably just hormones and not the real end of the world. You're also likely to hyperfixate on something. Pull out your knitting a fixate on that, instead of risking fixating on something someone said off-handedly a decade ago that now makes you cry".

(The message is user-configurable. Mine doesn't say that verbatum, but that's the gist.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I'm happy with the built-in privacy, muchly because I'm using it on a work computer so I have no expectation of real privacy anyway.

And fair.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've moved to Vivaldi recently and it's been refreshingly not-suck.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks :)

I didn't think I could go back to not having a backup camera, heated side mirrors, and that feature that detects when your wheels are slipping and makes adjustments so you still go the way your steering wheel indicates.

Airbags and ABS are non-negotiable.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The other day I saw a mid-90s shitbox in the parking lot and it made me so hopeful for my 2008 car. Like, that's a sign my car has at least 10 more years in it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 weeks ago

Partner and I once test drove a car that had "passed" a something something-point inspection at the dealer. As partner turns onto the highway he realizes it doesn't have a rear-view mirror. We were not impressed with that dealership. (Partner later said that when he got in he made sure the mirrors were adjusted, but his brain didn't clock that there wasn't a rear-view mirror until he had to use it. TBF, the missing mirror wasn't pointed the wrong way.)

Same dealership tried to badmouth my Prius in order to get it as a trade-in. Partner had introduced me as his roommate and driver, which made it even weirder.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, I'm in the same boat. I'm crossing my fingers that it doesn't suck. At least I have no contact.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm on Mint Mobile and they've not disappointed me yet. TBF, I have minimal expectations.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago

My therapist keeps reassuring me that they have their own therapist and I don't need to worry about their feelings. Parentification is a hell of a drug.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Same thing over on education. US government entities down to the local level have to comply with WCAG 2.1 by April 2026 iorc, with some exceptions for content created before the cutoff. The exceptions aren't clearly defined which is causing me a bit of a headache.

I mean, I'd love for all of our legacy documents and images to magically get image descriptions and quality OCR, but the archives have a terabyte of images and PDFs. It doesn't help that the ruling uses "archives" to mean "legacy stuff unlikely to be used" and we use "archives" to mean "stuff about the history of the college, which students are encouraged to consult".

Anyways, I'm all for accessibility. It's good. I'm just borrowing worries from tomorrow about implementation.

I just had the thought that some of our documents are handwritten in ye olde handwriting. That will be the biggest pain in the neck to transcribe. (Shout-out to Transkribus for making it suck less, but it'll still need to be proofread). I worry that we'll scan and post fewer of our documents going forward if we have to provide a transcription when we post them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I, for one, am extremely inconvenienced by not toggling "blind" or "vision impaired" mode in my OS or browser. The existance of a high contrast mode also offends me. The thought that websites might be navigable using speech readers keeps me up at night.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah, I thought you were being racist against people who might sing a song in a non-English language.

view more: next ›