ealoe

joined 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago

Wtf would a low level IT contractor turned spy know about that? Quoting Snowden just makes you look like a moron

[–] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I can switch to Matrix and talk to the two other users on this platform! Can't wait!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I use Discord all the time with a VPN, that isn't the only reason they restricted your account.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

That is a good point, mine is the second variety, electric one similar to the ones you see littering any major Urban area waiting to be rented. Although even the largest scooter is still far less safe over a pothole or around a rainy curve than a car, typical accident in the car you mess up the car and get a bruise from the airbag, but a typical scooter accident can be a lot more gnarly.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago

Only three people died last year playing Russian Roulette, must be pretty safe! /s

[–] [email protected] 26 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Hit a pothole going 25mph in your car. Hit the same pothole going 25mph on your scooter. I'll come visit you in the hospital after the scooter one and we can talk about how cars are obviously safer.

I ride an electric scooter, all it takes is one crack in the road that I'm less than prepared for and I'm going down hard.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

Stop trying to reset stolen iPhones then, IDK what to tell you

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What if that standard were to be applied to the people making the assertions? Shouldn't the burden of proof be on the accuser, not the accused? Seems kinda backwards the way you described it, someone can just say some things about you and now you are obligated to release internal documents/chat logs/emails or whatever else to prove their assertions wrong?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 5 months ago (7 children)

If you're one of the people in this thread insisting this does nothing to exonerate LTT, what would you accept as evidence that they're innocent? I don't follow YouTube drama much at all, I just think it's wild when people form an opinion based on on set of statements and then are never open to learning more facts about the case ever again.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

Facebook (Meta) actually has a cutting edge team that researches and fights disinformation, they publish some really cool research every few months I recommend reading it. Unfortunately, their efforts amount to pissing on a wildfire that the rest of the company is doing its best to dump gasoline on, since that team is under-resourced compared to the teams tasked with increasing user engagement.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A wise Jedi once said, "The ability to speak does not make you intelligent"

[–] [email protected] 26 points 6 months ago

My case rests, the seller of the book provided you a valuable service then by making a product available to you that you otherwise wouldn't be able to get, and you're mad that they made a little money for their time?

view more: ‹ prev next ›