deft

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Any day now those vaxxed will drop dead!!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Solution for what

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

why do you think that??

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Private just makes more money and also you can do ridiculous shit like blow up your own rocket, destroying a landing pad in the process and ignore environmental and labor laws.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

lol "innovation" what is this 1925?

how innovative are the cars being produced because they look the same.

half those medicines are publicly funded

the Internet is publicly funded.

this belief of private sector innovation is not as true as they sell it to be.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Everything should.

Medicine. Internet. Waste disposal.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's not what's being said here. Not Sony losing rights to a game, just entirely being unable to provide proof of ownership on digital content.

I've had Microsoft do this to me for Minecraft during their transition to owning it where they claimed I didn't own the game. I had to legitimately email them a picture of a receipt I owned to get my account back. Had I not had that receipt I'd not have the game.

I've never had Sony do this but I hear they've done this exact thing to people in other ways usually DLCs.

With NFTs there's a third party undeniable proof of purchase and ownership. It takes that whole side away from the distributor giving power to the consumer.

In a better world I could then sell that NFT and proof of purchase and the company would honor it for the person I sold it to allowing for the resale of digital content.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Back with GameStop the hope was the ability to sell/trade digital content like games. Because you actually own the digital content and the proof of purchase, closest to digital ownership I've seen.

PlayStation out here taking games after people bought them and shit is a strong reason for NFTs imo

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I mean low key it's supposed to be a receipt that can't be copied. The receipt being slapped onto an image is what most associated with NFTs but it's more just like a code that provides proof of purchase/ownership because you can trace the history on the block chain

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the world outside touch grass

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

some people are 15 though

view more: next ›