catch22

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

But fascism's primary aim isn't to destroy humanity, it does because it's idiotic, but it's very much the top picture, ~~growth~~greed or die.

Fascism is a philosophy that believes the strong should have and the weak can be used and discarded. Accepting were fucked I'd say is more nilism. Will fascists exploit the chaos from humanity idiocy, fuck yeah they will...

[–] [email protected] 19 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ummm was weather foresting not always done using probalistic interference models, i.e AI?

Weather forecasts have recently felt like they've been less accurate, i.e. you maybe get a good level of confidence for a day, but two days and it might be completely different. This makes sense given the climate is changing and previous models wont fit as well...

Are LLMs going to consume search data for raincoats and air-conditioning to improve the weather forecast. Clearly time to invest in AI now, the revolution is here!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In another timeline, the apprentice didn't run and when trump tried to run after being insulted by Obama, had people laughing at him like RFK.

Fucking idiotbox...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

How do you know what's it supposed to do, if no one actually wrote that down, other than

As a person.
I would like it to work
So i can do the things.

To be fair, at least that's something...

Or maybe for testing the documentation is the code. The code does this, write a test that accepts it does this.

I like the concept of describing things in scenarios and having data objects embedded in the scenarios. I think gherkin if a bit too restrictive, the same way user stories are, but a more natural verbose scenario that was parameterised with variables tied to actual data makes it explicit what is supposed to happen and what data the system will consume, create or manipulate.

E: there is of course other types of documentation available

[–] [email protected] 19 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Praise Stallman

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Apple greedy and bad right?

Yes.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, I'm a lazy shite, I just did an image search for clippy 1984. I feel bad now I didn't make more of an effort 😕

[–] [email protected] 102 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Cool! This seems like an good write up on it

https://atoonk.medium.com/tcp-bbr-exploring-tcp-congestion-control-84c9c11dc3a9

Bottleneck Bandwidth and Round-trip propagation time (BBR) is a TCP congestion control algorithm developed at Google in 2016. Up until recently, the Internet has primarily used loss-based congestion control, relying only on indications of lost packets as the signal to slow down the sending rate. This worked decently well, but the networks have changed. We have much more bandwidth than ever before; The Internet is generally more reliable now, and we see new things such as bufferbloat that impact latency. BBR tackles this with a ground-up rewrite of congestion control, and it uses latency, instead of lost packets as a primary factor to determine the sending rate.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago

Almost like if you make the planet better for people, it makes it better for everyone 🤯

[–] [email protected] 31 points 9 months ago (2 children)
view more: next ›