Heck you could even keep the hierarchy, but with no representation of the workers in leadership you lose an major perspective on the organization.
andruid
The fact that the employees were able represent their defacto power in a crisis is good, but the fact that the don't have explicit power in the decision making process is why this able to happen in the first place.
There are no good kings, even if the best men were made kings, they would be inherently tainted by the position.
No nix is super cool! I really like the idea that guix and nix in having that system as code from build to deployment. I am not sure yet on how I feel about it for fleet/cluster deployments, k8s schedulers, network patterns like service meshes, ETCD, and operating on labels and cluster state are all super powerful.
I have looked too into using nix to make OCI containers and OCI containers to make flatpaks as well. All where they make sense of course.
Containers are really awesome, but take a bit more to troubleshoot sometimes. Docker is not the only method to run them either. I prefer podman actually, but K3s is the next logical step for running services in a more powerful setup.
All true FOSS too
I was very surprised by how many people would follow the CEO out like that. The board really failed to represent or listen to their workers.
Not-for-profits I feel tend to have this alignment issue...
I like the idea. Basically turning b Roll and background info into reproduceable info. So you could for example get a pixel perfect 8k view of say the main subject and edit around that instead of needing actual 8k of unimportant background scene.
I think an added one would trying to explore more with latent space to see how precise would might be able to get with the AI compressed details.
More useful than the thing I know my heard people talking about disabling? Wow, what a time to be alive!
It's the coordinated decentralization that really defines web from web2 and 1. Cooperative vs competitive coordination is just a sub strategy within that, but I don't think either strategy is always best for all problems.
I like Dan Olson's video but I don't think it's truly unassailable. There is some real use cases for block chains in low trust networks. One of those being global monetary policy. Another critic is that web3 applications (like Mastadon and Lemmy ..) I think is moving forward even more so as the age of easy money comes to a full close.
While it is funny (honestly replacing any tech term with circlejerk in a tech article makes it sound so funny to me, I have the mind of a child), it's not very relevent here.
Honestly even this platform, but any public platform without e2e and the direct choice of who to share it with.
I mean isn't this, Lemmy, an answer as well?