agamemnonymous

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

And he gets to keep the flute after!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I suggest breaking it down into sub questions based on expertise of the audience and nature of the information: technical, narrative, cultural, emotional, etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is too broad. It's like asking "what's the best wrench to tighten nuts and bolts?" For some applications that's a torque wrench, some it's a box end, some it's a socket wrench, some it's a crescent wrench, sometimes it's a pair of vice grips and a hammer. Anything that could properly be called a mode of communication has use cases where it's clearer than others.

The OBD code that's unintelligible to the lay person is the clearest way to communicate a discrete engine problem to a mechanic. A graph that plots a particular change over time might perfectly communicate the raw data, while being incapable of communicating narrative context. A meme image or referential quote might perfectly communicate a specific emotional concept to a broad group that gets the reference, while being totally opaque to those who don't.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (5 children)

There are a lot of ways to interpret this question, it really depends on the information and the people.

Between experts trained in the method of communication? Between experts and a general audience? One expert and one non-expert? Is it technical data? Nuanced opinion? Simple message?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

And complementary to Chesterton's Fence is a principle I've heard called Grandma's Ham or the Monkey Ladder Experiment. Sometimes "we've always done it that way" is covering up outdated practices for purposes that no longer exist.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

Gosh, I wanna say I saw it at least as far back as 2010, possibly older.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Not immediately no, but I like to at least entertain the most charitable explanation when so little information is given.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Well, if she attacked him first it would be self-defense

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I just got the 9 Fold and I really like it so far. The fold screen has a weirdly square aspect ratio, but it's excellent for reading.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Bet you read that in a textbook

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I was in my university's Society of Physics Students, and some of the members got to have dinner with NDT after a talk he gave at the school. Reports confirm he is a self-centered, arrogant douchebag

 

Looks innocuous enough at first glance right? Let's zoom in on the problem:

These don't go together. If the semicircle on the left is correct, then this is showing moon phases, and the symbol on the right should be of a gibbous moon:

If the cookie-with-a-bite-taken-out in the right is correct, then this is showing an eclipse, and the symbol on the left should be of a 50% partial eclipse:

It drives me crazy every time I look at it.

view more: next ›