Sizzler

Nah you don't get it, the design is a 1 to 1 rip off. I'll have a quick look to see if I can find the post.

Not the one I was thinking of but

https://www.forbes.com/sites/tychodefeijter/2016/12/15/how-a-chinese-automaker-can-clone-porsche-and-still-get-away-with-it/

Why? Do you feel like you are team Microsoft and anyone suggesting you could have a better experience on another operating system is the enemy?

Bloody beautiful, well done.

An occasional stopover location for wizards.

Create and reply, create and reply.

Or we could start to organise. See how quickly we can get Lemmy etc al in the news and watch it grow.

Ok that's 1, anyone else still here?

"This is America" episode 3(?) When he's receiving a hand job whilst discussing buying a boat to smuggle people. Perfect example.

There is no modify, only a down button, I suppose lazers are pretty effective but they are banned right? And EMP? I think I can survive that but I'm sure someone will be along to tell me I won't.

I've pointed out that they are weapons and being presented in a friendly way, that's all, why argue when you asked the question?

The drone hovers and goes down instead of up. A 200 mile an hour brick that if used right could go for multiple targets before failure.

Tru dat

What use is the information in this case?

To me it can be summed up as: Lazers can be defeated (more like we are not willing to leave our best lazer tech lying around)

Signal blocking can be defeated

So we've resorted to flying bricks to defeat YOUR drones, don't even think of using them.

Oh and just remember they are presenting them in a "drone travels up" way....

But they could do the exact opposite to an "object" on the ground. (A highly deadly "penny off the empire state")

Kids love to fight, adults realise there are better solutions.