Quill7513

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

No its not running on all Linux machines. Just like its not running on all wondows machines. But the companies who employ it on their employees laptops also run it on their servers. Crowd strike has easily deployed .debs, .rpms, and .tar.gzs, as well as golden images with it already installed. What we experienced yesterday was the minor version of this catastrophe. If the Linux push had been bad, decent chance it would have taken down major internet structure including the DNS servers you typically use to resolve internet addresses. It would seem to a large number of users that the entire internet was down

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Add some extra zeroes to that ransomware figure...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

(Crowd strike also runs on Linux. This could have happened to Linux too)

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Just a little bit of a correction. Crowd strike publishes agents for Windows, Linux, and MacOS. Its just the particular broken agent is for Windows. They had a 1/3 chance of taking down any one of their three client bases

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

Let's ignore that it was an American company taking down EVERYONE'S stuff, I guess

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

Push that into the technical debt. Then afterwards never pay off the technical debt

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

By a wide margin

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely nothing to do with windows pipelines or Microsoft

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

There are design decisions that I really don't understand why Sony made them. They do, however, make the PS3 the ideal piece of hardware if you're wanting to build an adhoc super computer

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Emulating a processor with a unique set of properties, including infinite scalability, is hard. You can't just put an emulation layer on top of x86 like you can with a processor that's a subset of x86 instructions

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I've gone the opposite direction. I've slowly been expanding my list of sites that don't work with ctrl-shift-a and for the most part assuming it will work for all sites

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

No. It isn't. The setting in the modal should act as a convenience component that doesn't have any of its own data. It only modifies the value in the original source of truth. Once the modal has been used, it should never pop up again, as the assumption will be if the user has interacted with the modal, they are now aware of the setting and can set it themselves from the original source of truth. Unless of course you consider any feature speghettification

view more: ‹ prev next ›