Quexotic

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Yes. In a dream, I fell in love with someone I know in real life now. It was psychologically disruptive. In the dream, we'd loved each other for thousands of years. The emotions did not end upon waking and persist to today to some extent.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A collage would be fair use, yes I believe that's already been established but again I'm not like a copyright lawyer or anything like that. I'll leave that for others to research and prove in the courtroom.

I would say that your first example, as it file is not really accurate but the collage may be more so. It's a statistical model that calculates statistically what a thing should be. Is it learning? Maybe maybe not.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Thank you very much for summoning Jeff Goldblum's voice into my head.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I think that the argument is that it's not actually copying it and instead learning from it.

I feel like they really have to pay something. Maybe their argument is right and they shouldn't pay full price given that if a human did the same thing to learn to make music, they also wouldn't be billed in that way, given it's openly available.

Maybe they are required to give a portion of profits back to the source materials creators?

The purpose of the copyright system is that someone should not be allowed to take your material and sell it to someone else passing it off as your own and make the profit thereby stealing the profit from you. I don't think that's what's happening here but also at the same time it doesn't seem like what they're doing is right because they're making profit off of somebody else's work without paying anything.

It feels to me like the answer should be somewhere in the middle.

I certainly don't have the answers though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

For them I don't think it matters. I think the whole goal is to have further awareness and having people burning time on it like we're doing right now brings more awareness to the issue regardless what side you're on. They believe their side is just so that it will win out in general and bringing further awareness and making people think about it can only be a good thing.

Tl;Dr: awareness.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (6 children)

I believe the end goal is to cause conversations like the above.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

I'm too chicken.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago (6 children)

I'm in. This world desperately needs an information workers union. Someone to cover those poor fuckers in the help desk and desktop support as well as the engineers and architects that keep all of this shit running.

Those of us that aren't underpaid are treated poorly. Today is what it looks like if everybody strikes at once.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

I wish you were right. I really wish you were. I don't think you are. I'm not trying to be a contrarian but I don't think for a large number of organizations that this is the case.

For what it's worth I truly hope that I'm 100% incorrect and everybody learns from this bullshit but that may not be the case.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

That's exactly the challenge. Without some sort of visa in hand we really don't have any options so we're still early in the planning. I've looked at New Zealand and Canada though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago (3 children)

We're preparing to leave the US.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

I happily concede!

view more: ‹ prev next ›