Osa-Eris-Xero512

While its nice when a program let's you pick the egress interface for its network traffic, split tunneling is still on the host os for handling its route table and making sure that's set up correctly. Like, were people setting up split tunnel networks where they were treating the vpn interface as a proxy, pointing the software at it, and just hoping for the best?

split tunneling is not 100% secure

This keeps being said and I don't understand why people keep saying it. Split tunneling should be exactly as secure as your route table makes it, shouldn't it?

This is why I wish those micropayment systems took off. I would be happy to pay 20 bucks a month for 'ad free' browsing if most of it actually supported the creators of the content i'm accessing.

10x their cpm is still fractions of a cent for me as a user on a per page view basis, there's space for winning here if one of the big ~~tech~~ ad companies gets behind it and pushes.

Yeah, neither team is playing well tonight, but the chiefs have just been off form all game except the 4th quarter.

2 issues there: the food and fuel for those cities move through the traitor parts of the state. Supply lines will be a major issue in the early weeks of any major event. In addition to that, those blue cities aren't homogeneous just like their states aren't, so there will be further subdivision past the metro line.

Yeah, CC doesn't cover it in any case. Any attempt would probably need some sort of bespoke license to specifically target the training use case while still allowing comments to be used like normal.

And a Microsoft-sized pile of money to fight it out in court.

I think a lot of the concern here, for me if noone else, is them taking the data and then turning it around into a closed for-sale product. If AI is going to be trained, it should be trained well, but if the result of doing so is them turning around and charging [me/us/everyone, as applicable] an ass load for the privilege of its use then I want no part of it.

AI trained on public data should be public. So if adding boilerplate is the solution to this problem, let it be infectious licensing which forces opening of the resultant model to the public.

Wouldn't scotus ruling one way or the other, due to this being 14A, also automatically apply to the other states?

I think there might be something to be said here for some potential selection bias. Are Tesla drivers like ram drivers, overly aggressive idiots but with the added layer of being relatively new tech?

Who choose to exist at the nazi bar that Twitter has become.

You'll probably never find a 1:1 replacement for youtube, but Nebula has a lot of similar content on it for a reasonable price.

So now they can pause comments until the heat dies down while looking reasonable because of the existing comments.