Hyperreality

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

All the world’s a stage and all the men and women merely players.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

Vanity. It's the Devil's favourite sin.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Basic g-shock or the classic F91W.

The former, I'm a fan of the DW5600BB. Blacked out, minimalist, works with almost everything (even a suit), indestructible. A choice even watch snobs can respect. 50-100 dollars/euros on amazon.

The F91W comes in a few fun colours. I personally like black and gold. It's retro, so it's invariably seen as cool. It's also dirt cheap. 10-20 dollars/euros.

They've been making them for decades. A classic. Different colours if that's your style.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Bit of a curve ball, but I'm a huge fan of a simple casio.

When you're in a city or a deprived poorer area, it's far safer to look at your watch than take out your phone.

It's also more professional in a work context, especially in customer facing roles. If you look at your phone to check the time, people are more likely to think you're checking your notifications and not fully engaged in what you're doing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Hey, it rhymes. That's something.

I miss headlines being pun or rhyme based.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds

Especially their podcasts and audio dramas.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

On a related note, I'm still annoyed microsoft bungled the windows phone and didn't do more to support app developers. Arguably better than osx and certainly android at the time.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The idea isn't to pretend to be something you're not. Don't do that.

The idea is that you do an activity you find interesting, that way you're not wasting your time, and prospective partners get to know what you're like from watching you or talking to you. From what I gather, a lot of the texting in modern dating, is because they don't know what you're actually like as a person. You might be a serial killer, 40 years older than your picture, or raving lunatic.

So for example, instead of using tinder, you go on a language course because that's something you've always wanted to learn. You learn a language, someone in the course finds you attractive, they observe you interacting with others, you're a bit different, but otherwise friendly and/or harmless. They talk to you during the course about something they're not actually interested in, say homework. You get to interact a bit, without it being a date, and see if there's chemistry. Perhaps one night you walk them to the bus or stay to clean up. Once again, not an actual date. Just getting to know if you're relatively safe.

Worst case scenario, you learnt a language, did something you enjoyed. You didn't waste too much time. With a bit of luck, you make a few friends/acquaintances and practice your social skills a bit. And if you're lucky, there is chemistry, and you don't need to do the weird post tinder match text convo. You already know each other a bit, they know you don't like texting (or that you're too busy) and you're not trying to hide the fact you have a wife, so the first real date is far less awkward.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I wonder how old she is. The smoking and tanning has obviously aged her face.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“enable proton compatibility” checkbox with their anticheat.

Isn't proton mainly a steam thing?

Because honestly, the reason I'm not jumping to linux, is all the heavily modded GOG stuff and nexus mod manager.

That and bad experiences in the past.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Good journalists will never make their own opinion on the matter known outside the comment/opinion/analysis pages.

Not: Man eats a delicious red apple

Not: Man eats a red apple and says it's delicious.

But: Man says he ate a red apple and claims it is delicious.

Or in some cases: Footage appears to show many saying he ate a red apple and claiming it was delicious.

If the journalist didn't see it with their own eyes, they won't state that it's a fact.

It's annoying how intertwined opinion and journalism have become, but it isn't a journalist's job to do anything more than report on what they saw, read or heard.

Unfortunately journalism has been in decline for so long now, that many people don't know the difference between good and poor journalism. So when a good journalist simply reports on what someone said, they wrongly think the journalist is agreeing with them, instead of simply reporting on what they heard the person say.

Good journalism isn't someone shouting about how angry something makes them, even if you agree with them. Good journalism is the equivalent of a court stenographer or someone who subtitles movies for the deaf.

view more: ‹ prev next ›