FiskFisk33

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That title almost gave me a stroke

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

the task is clearly repeisitive

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I saw deal today at a store:
buy a galaxy fold, get a free 55" tv.

Say your phone is overpriced without saying your phone is overpriced

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

bob'; DROP TABLE users;

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Porque no los dos?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

������������������������������������������������

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

"end process"

thats why.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The technical debt is strong in this one

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Reminds me of this glorious way of dealing with a similar problem https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-qc0aaY-3qY

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

does not mean that they should still provide you the service.

I never said that, in fact I mentioned their right to try to stop me.

Also I never implied any entitlement to their services, just that if it's there in the open, I will access it, my way.

please if you argue with me, argue with me, not a strawman of my approximate likeness.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Right?
I have the right to use any subset of what they put on the public web, and they have the right to try to stop me.

Serving ads is not a right, sure you might argue it's fair they get something back, I get that, but access to my eyeballs is not a right.

I will be on board when they lower their prices, until then, game on.

view more: ‹ prev next ›