FiskFisk33

Yup. I don't think training should be considered breaking copyright. Regurgitating though should.

There are examples of use cases besides the right now obvious one of LLMs "creating" "original" content.

One that comes to my mind is indexing books. Allowing for people to search for books based on a description.

I know this is a definition in many places. I find it stupid and useless.

The heart beating is not a good definition of being alive in my opinion. The heart stopping temporarily doesn't mean you died, you were just in terribly grave danger.

If a person is defined by their heart, what does that make a heart transplant?

utterly useless definition.

On the other hand, it is not the learning in your example that is illegal, but the recital.

If you learn ten books by heart and make money writing shitty fanfics, thats not necessarily illegal.

and the music

oh god the reason is even stupider then I expected

Because large numbers use the e character in their string representation (e.g., 6.022e23 for 6.022 × 1023), using parseInt to truncate numbers will produce unexpected results when used on very large or very small numbers. parseInt should not be used as a substitute for Math.trunc().

Not the article, the commenter before you points at a deeper issue.

It doesn't matter how if your prompt tells it not to lie is it isn't actually capable of following that instruction.

I assume they're talking about the design and training, not the prompt.

I still see it too, interestingly

if someone has ideas, I say let them cook. Open sourcing this can't be bad for anyone imo.

Though I agree in a way, I don't understand what anyone found potentially useful with this thing in the first place.

as digitized almost all societal functions are, we really should define basic internet access as a human right.