NSFW is going to get banned within a year or two. It would be irresponsible towards the share holders not to, because porn lowers advertising value.
Fisk400
joined 1 year ago
At least they didnt intigrate it with Gmail or some other insane bloat they like to do.
They know what they fed the thing. Not backing up their own training data would be insane. They are not insane, just thieves
I did articulate it. It is not my fault that inhuman ghouls cant understand the point.
You are in no way different from the people typing "big tiddies" into a prompt box and hitting generate. You only sound slightly more intelligent to the other cold husks but to us standing by the bonfire, you look exactly the same. I actually respect the titty people more because they know what they are and dont pretend to care.
I don't know what part of my answer full of contempt made you think that I am open to the standard tech bro babble?
I think you are disgusting people and charlatans desperately trying to pretend that you know what art is. Is that a clearer response for you. The first response was a bit too creative so I understand why you wouldn't understand it.
Yes, some people don't notice the creative void in AI because they are themselves hollow humunculuses. They crawl at the edge of the human fire of creation and gather stray embers that hit the dead sands they occupy. Once in a while they find an ember with some faded glow left and they hold it up and say "The more details I add to my prompts, the more unique of a look I can achieve."
I pity them because they will never understand true warmth.
Have you seen those images of a bunch of people overlaid on each other so that shared features become clear and outliers become fuzzy. The result is an average human but it doesn't actually look like anyone in particular because it's a human with no striving feature or bold choice. Thats why AI look the same, they all have the same dull parts of real art but none of the interesting bits.
Maybe having private citizens control important military architecture is a bad idea.
Why is it the only chair available? Why can't it be replaced? Who decided to put that chair there and why does that person thing its sufficient? Why do you require a chair in that yard? Is it someones yard or is it a public space that happens to have a plastic chair?
Could you answer at least one of these questions. Any information that isn't just a picture of a broken stool would be nice.
Is the plan that you are going to use that nail scissor as your main household scissor? When you buy something in a thick blister pack your plan is to awkwardly chew trough the plastic with a tiny and slightly curved nail scissor?