Earflap

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

If the keys have been lost then so has Satoshi. Otherwise any random idiot can say they're satoshi. Sucks to suck.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

Then it would be trivial to sign a message using his known wallet address that could be cryptographicly verified. But he is lying so he can't.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah but sometimes the only producers are QAMEQHEJAK and you can't even find what real brand sells your thing. Or sometimes they don't do direct sales.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

What is this, a crossover episode?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was talking to my cousin (journalist) a while ago and she told me how she was supposed to interview a whistleblower for Anaheim PD. I snarkily commented something like, "yeah but let me guess he shot himself twice in the back of the head" and she alarmingly said "...yeah, how did you know?"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There's a third option: Black holes create new universes through some as yet undiscovered process. Then your existence just becomes a statistical eventuality, as do every other life that you could ever live.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Honestly I never really did. I asked some kid in 5th grade what Santa got him for Christmas and he scoffed at me for still believing. I went, "uhhhh yes... this is information I definitely already knew. Yesssssss..." and never really brought it up with anyone again. ¯\(ツ)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Almost all of those are for the database release, not the production release.

Even if they are for the current production release was last April. Considering the buggy mess their product is, that's kind of unacceptable for an app that is supposed to hold your entire lifes data.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As best I can tell, no such thing happened. Feel free to provide some credible sources to back that up though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Can't put the genie back in the bottle. Would probably be a different story if China released this years ago.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

https://discuss.logseq.com/t/why-the-database-version-and-how-its-going/26744

I get it. And I don't necessarily disagree with them, but it gives me concerns over the long term viability of the project. If obsidian did blocks the same way logseq did I'd probably jump ship and use that, but you can't really brain dump in obsidian the same way you can in logseq.

view more: next ›