DreadPotato

If you look at prices for something like the Nio cars without the battery here in Europe, they're hardly competitive with regular EVs. The price saving is substantially less than a battery replacement. With the battery subscription (doesnt even include the day-to-day charging, which isbkikelu to be done at homeequating to a battery life of just under 6 years, it seems like a pretty bad deal.

And for everyday driving, you're likely still charging at home overnight, so the battery rental cost is just extra on top of that.

$200/month to drive an EV is really expensive though. I drive 30.000km/year and pay around $70/month in electricity for the car. The average driver in my country drives something like 12.000km/year, so that's closer to $30/month in electricity. That makes $200 seem insane.

Relax I was merely making a joke on meta's excessive data hoarding, not a thoughtful comment on the actual implementation.

Then you have a very unreliable system, stopping without actual reason all the time, causing immense frustration for the user. Is it safe? I guess, cars that don't move generally are. Is it functional? No, not at all.

I'm not advocating unsafe implementations here, I'm just pointing out that your suggestion doesn't actually solve the issue, as it leaves a solution that's not functional.

Furthermore, isn't it technically possible to train the lidar and radar with Ai as well?

Of course it is, functionally both the camera and lidar solutions work in vector-space. The big difference is that a camera feed holds a lot more information beyond simple vector-space to feed the AI straining with than a lidar feed ever will.

Yes the solution is fairly simple in theory, implementing this is significantly harder, which is why it is not a trivial issue to solve in robotics.

I'm not saying their decision was the right one, just that his argument with multiple sensors creating noise in the decision-making is a completely valid argument.

The weird part is that none of teslas employees are part of this strike in any of the countries...like, why are they not participating in this!?

what if the camera and lidar disagree, then what?

This (sensor fusion) is a valid issue in mobile robotics. Adding more sensors doesn't necessarily improve stability or reliability.

Even less of an issue then, why the fuck care if Win11 sucks ass when you're not even part of their customer base.

Because you think they should pay more for a product they already bought or because privacy and security are not important?

I said they didn't have to think bout it for another two years...none of what you're saying makes sense in relation to that. Its good they don't need to worry about it (yet), because the issues it may cause them is still far away.

EOL for Win10 LTSC