DrBob

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's an analogy. There is actually an academic joke about the point you are making.

A mathematician and an engineer are sitting at a table drinking when a very beautiful woman walks in and sits down at the bar.

The mathematician sighs. "I'd like to talk to her, but first I have to cover half the distance between where we are and where she is, then half of the distance that remains, then half of that distance, and so on. The series is infinite. There'll always be some finite distance between us."

The engineer gets up and starts walking. "Ah, well, I figure I can get close enough for all practical purposes."

The point of the analogy is not that one can't get close enough so that the ear can't detect a difference, it's that in theory analog carries infinite information. It's true that vinyl recordings are not perfect analog systems because of physical limitations in the cutting process. It's also true for magnetic tape etc. But don't mistake the metaphor for the idea.

Ionic movement across membranes, especially at the scale we are talking about, and the density of channels in the system is much closer to an ideal system. How much of that fidelity can you lose before it's not your consciousness?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (8 children)

Thanks fellow traveller for punching holes in computational stupidity. Everything you said is true but I also want to point out that the brain is an analog system so the information in a neuron is infinite relative to a digital system (cf: digitizing analog recordings). As I tell my students if you are looking for a binary event to start modeling, look to individual ions moving across the membrane.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Steve Reich has a lot of interesting stuff. I have heard Clapping Music performed several times. https://youtube.com/watch?v=liYkRarIDfo

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Anytime. Cheers.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This is why he was on pain killers. https://youtube.com/watch?v=eZ3d1Cp8wts

And you are not entitled to your own facts, particularly when you are slandering people.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (4 children)

The core point here is you are making a pedophile joke about someone who doesn't deserve it. So fuck you. I'm not saying he deserves citizen of the year, but that's a long way from being a punchline about raping a child.

Everybody who was exploited as a child has issues. Britney Spears, Michael, etc have all been in show business since they should have been learning to print. Are they fucked up? You bet, but they never got a childhood so maybe we can cut them some slack.

There are some protections now so Emma Watson, Daniele Radcliffe, Miley Cyrus had some protection, but those earlier generations had nothing.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (6 children)

Stop it. Jackson was never convicted criminally, found guilty in any of the civil suits, and the accusers appeared to fraudsters and in debt. His last years were miserable from people making false claims. Go pick on one of the million pedophiles in the church or politics.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago

You're a hero.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It would have to - that was the length of a film reel. I think Birth of a Nation was the first non-serial multi reel film to be shown in 1915.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Back in the old days (hangs onion from belt) we could smoke in the office. I knew a 3 pack a day smoker - Canada so 25 to a pack. The only way he could manage to do it is that he always had one in his hand. If he didn't, he lit another one. That meant that he'd often put one down to do something, forget about it in the ashtray, and light another. I occasionally saw him with 3 going at once.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I was genuinely taken aback at how much the article focused on interpersonal relationships and gender. I am much more familiar with the concept in bureaucracy the way the post teased it.

view more: ‹ prev next ›